Posted on 03/17/2016 9:46:22 AM PDT by huldah1776
The secret-sharing website WikiLeaks has published a searchable archive of more than 30,000 Hillary Clinton emails that have been released by the State Department.
Unveiled on Wednesday, the archive allows users to browse through 30,322 emails and attachments sent to or from Clinton's private email server while she was secretary of state. In all, the archive comprises 50,547 pages spanning from June 30, 2010, to Aug. 12, 2014. According to the site, Clinton authored 7,570 of those documents.
The State Department began releasing the emails in May of last year pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request, but it is the first time that the messages have been made easily available in a searchable format. The final PDFs of all the emails were just made available by the State Department last month.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
WikiLeaks. Doing the job the Republican Party just won’t do.
Are these redacted or untouched?
I just want to read the ones about Chelsea’s wedding. /s
Clever screen name—Latin for “slip of the pen”.
No hits for "cankle" :(
FYI
If these e-mails have been made available by Obama’s State Dept, I am sure there is nothing of consequence in any of them. But there WILL BE A BIG DEAL made about them in Big Media.
Something isn’t making sense here. If these emails were supposed to be secure, secret, top secret, ultra top secret et al, how is it that they’re being released by the government at all, much less wikileaks?
They can’t be very secret or damaging if the government is willing to release them to the public for any reason, FOIA or not.
If they aren’t secret or damaging, then how in the world can they even go after Hillary?
Hillary kept them on her server, she didn’t share them with the public the way the government is doing. So, even if her server was hacked, there’s nothing on there that the public at large can’t see!!
Quite frankly, I don’t like her, and don’t want her as president or anything else for that matter, but as long as the government is going to throw this stuff to the wind, then what case do they actually have against her?
I’m sure the queen of the shredding machine has reasons for keeping separate records, but a case could be made that she felt a need to cover her own ass. She’s not the only corrupt politician or employee in DC, and her throat was just as vulnerable as any body elses.
What I’m wondering at this point in time, is whether or not the home server was an Apple, and if so, why is this stuff not encrypted? How is it that they’re able to access the files? Maybe I’m wrong to expect Apple’s computer software to be as secure as their phone software? And if it is, what’s going on here?
I don’t know what the truth actually is, but I do know that something’s wrong with the story. It just doesn’t have that ring of truth to it. Something doesn’t make sense.
Bumping!
ASA Vet for your info.
Do any of the emails contain messages on Chelsea’s wedding and yoga classes like Hillary claims?
Wikileaks is more than likely not part of our official government.
Someone in our government, probably got tired of Lynch, Obama’s AG sitting on top of these email and leaked them to Wikileaks.
Then Wikileaks got them out for Americans and the world to see and read.
You can use boolean operators to search emails.
(Example: syria libya will show results containing both words. syria | libya will show results with either words, while syria !libya will show results containing “syria” and not “libya”.)
I like their search hints
bump
The government should have provided these in a searchable format instead of trying to hide them.
Oh, and where are the others that she didn’t hand over?
I believe Cankles gave them to the government on paper. She should have been required to turn them over in searchable digital form.
I searched “death” and a lot of emails came up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.