Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Is ILLEGAL To Protest At Campaign Rallies (H.R. 347, Signed by Obama Feb. 2012)
GovTrack.US ^ | 3/13/2016 | USConservative

Posted on 03/13/2016 12:49:36 PM PDT by usconservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: bryan999

So PLEASE help it go viral!


21 posted on 03/13/2016 1:00:07 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

ROFL! Well played.


22 posted on 03/13/2016 1:00:43 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Can Trump get a restraining order against eg MoveOn?


23 posted on 03/13/2016 1:00:53 PM PDT by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Laws do not apply to Leftists. DOJ/FBI have made that abundantly clear.


24 posted on 03/13/2016 1:00:58 PM PDT by Lexington Green (Trump! Because FU, GOPe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

-post the link to your FB page .... I did


25 posted on 03/13/2016 1:02:40 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I just sent it to Trump


26 posted on 03/13/2016 1:03:12 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Even more useful would be a demand to prosecute on conspiracy to violate this law. Hello Twitter.


27 posted on 03/13/2016 1:03:30 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
Soooooo, when I'm arrested for protesting a Shrillary Clinton gathering here in Illinois I can expect to be arrested and prosecuted then.

PERFECT!

"Judge, why aren't any of the BLM protesters who were arrested in Chicago, St. Louis and Ohio being prosecuted and isn't this an unequal application of the law?"

Can't wait to see the answer to that question!

28 posted on 03/13/2016 1:03:42 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

A University is not private property. What are you talking about?!
_____________________________________________________
Private or public is irrelevant if the grounds are where persons protected by the SS will be visiting.
Note: misdemeanor if no dangerous or deadly weapon or firearm involved or significant bodily injury occurs


29 posted on 03/13/2016 1:04:25 PM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


30 posted on 03/13/2016 1:04:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FirstFlaBn
And Hello Facebook!

While they cleaned up the Facebook site they used to plan it and removed all the incindiary posts before and after the "protest" Facebook DOES have archival functionality and a subpoena for those posts could easily be served with demand for the posts and identity of those posters.

Just sayin'.....

31 posted on 03/13/2016 1:05:01 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Should I hold my breath until Cruz, Rubio, Kasich, Sanders, and hillary demand that the protestors be charged?


32 posted on 03/13/2016 1:05:14 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Private or public is irrelevant if the grounds are where persons protected by the SS will be visiting.

Corrected.

33 posted on 03/13/2016 1:05:44 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

This is gonna get interesting...


34 posted on 03/13/2016 1:06:27 PM PDT by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grania
Hold your breath all you want my friend. Cruz, Rubio and Kasich all showed what sellouts they were with their comments. None of them care what you think or whether or not you hold your breath since you'll just pass out and start breathing on your own again anyway. (That's what I always told my kids when they were young, worked every time. They never held their breath.)

Hitlery and the Commie Sanders only agree with free speech as long as it agrees with them (but you already knew that.)

35 posted on 03/13/2016 1:07:20 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Really? Then why did that crap stain get charged with misdemeanors and released on $300 bail yesterday?


36 posted on 03/13/2016 1:08:26 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Trump 2016! Mabelkitty - Unengaged and Low Information Voter since 2000!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Because the Police in Ohio clearly don't know that this is the law.

You raise an excellent point: there ought to be a well orchestrated, PUBLIC PHONE CAMPAIGN to the relevant Police Department to ARREST and properly CHARGE that douchebag.

37 posted on 03/13/2016 1:09:26 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Sucks to cite a bill - here we go - with the annotations.

18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 84 - PRESIDENTIAL AND PRESIDENTIAL STAFF ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPPING, AND ASSAULT
Sec. 1752 - Restricted building or grounds
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§1752. Restricted building or grounds
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons—
(1) willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting;
(2) willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance;
(3) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, to engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any building or grounds described in paragraph (1) or (2) when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
(4) willfully and knowingly to obstruct or impede ingress or egress to or from any building, grounds, or area described in paragraph (1) or (2); or
(5) willfully and knowingly to engage in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any building, grounds, or area described in paragraph (1) or (2).

(b) Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be punishable by—
(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if—
(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm; or
(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and

(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case.

(c) Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be prosecuted by the United States attorney in the Federal district court having jurisdiction of the place where the offense occurred.
(d) None of the laws of the United States or of the several States and the District of Columbia shall be superseded by this section.
(e) As used in this section, the term “other person protected by the Secret Service” means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title when such person has not declined such protection.
(Added Pub. L. 91–644, title V, §18, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1891; amended Pub. L. 97–308, §1, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1451; Pub. L. 98–587, §3(b), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3112; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 109–177, title VI, §602(a), (b)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 252.)
Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177, §602(b)(1), substituted “Restricted building or grounds” for “Temporary residences and offices of the President and others” in section catchline.
Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(1)(A), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: “willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in
“(i) any building or grounds designated by the Secretary of the Treasury as temporary residences of the President or other person protected by the Secret Service or as temporary offices of the President and his staff or of any other person protected by the Secret Service, or
“(ii) any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting,
in violation of the regulations governing ingress or egress thereto:”
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(1)(C), added par. (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(1)(B), (D), redesignated par. (2) as (3), inserted “willfully, knowingly, and” before “with intent to impede or disrupt”, and substituted “described in paragraph (1) or (2)” for “designated in paragraph (1)”. Former par. (3) redesignated (4).
Subsec. (a)(4), (5). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(1)(B), (E), (F), redesignated pars. (3) and (4) as (4) and (5), respectively, and substituted “described in paragraph (1) or (2)” for “designated or enumerated in paragraph (1)” in each par.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(2), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: “Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be punishable by a fine under this title or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both.”
Subsecs. (d) to (f). Pub. L. 109–177, §602(a)(3), redesignated subsecs. (e) and (f) as (d) and (e), respectively, and struck out former subsec. (d) which read as follows: “The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized—
“(1) to designate by regulations the buildings and grounds which constitute the temporary residences of the President or other person protected by the Secret Service and the temporary offices of the President and his staff or of any other person protected by the Secret Service, and
“(2) to prescribe regulations governing ingress or egress to such buildings and grounds and to posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted areas where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting.”
1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322, which directed the amendment of this section by substituting “under this title” for “not more than $500”, was executed in subsec. (b) by substituting “under this title” for “not exceeding $500” to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1984—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 98–587 amended subsec. (f) generally, substituting “any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title when such person has not declined such protection” for “any person authorized by section 3056 of this title or by Public Law 90–331, as amended, to receive the protection of the United States Secret Service when such person has not declined such protection pursuant to section 3056 of this title or pursuant to Public Law 90–331, as amended”.
1982—Pub. L. 97–308, §1(a), substituted “Temporary residences and offices of the President and others” for “Temporary residence of the President” in section catchline.
Subsec. (a)(1)(i). Pub. L. 97–308, §1(b), made one’s presence unlawful at designated temporary residences and temporary offices of any other person protected by the Secret Service.
Subsec. (a)(1)(ii). Pub. L. 97–308, §1(c), inserted “or other person protected by the Secret Service” after “President”.
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 97–308, §1(d), authorized regulations for designation of the temporary residences and the temporary offices of any other person protected by the Secret Service.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 97–308, §1(e), inserted “or other person protected by the Secret Service” after “President”.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 97–308, §1(f), added subsec. (f).
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of the functions, personnel, assets, and obligations of the United States Secret Service, including the functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 381, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.


38 posted on 03/13/2016 1:09:36 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I posted this as a reply a day or so ago on this site. Glad you have it posted a main topic.


39 posted on 03/13/2016 1:10:06 PM PDT by Lumper20 ( clown in Chief has own Gov employees Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative; All
"Free Speech isn't covered ..."
1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I never noticed what appears to be somewhat contradictory clauses in 1st Amendment before. More specifically, although Congress is prohibited from making laws abridging the freedom of speech, the people also have the right to peacefully assemble.

40 posted on 03/13/2016 1:10:10 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson