Skip to comments.
North Korea threatens pre-emptive nuclear strikes against U.S., South Korea
Washington Times ^
| March 6, 2016
| Victor Morton
Posted on 03/06/2016 3:12:08 PM PST by rdl6989
North Korea threatened a pre-emptive nuclear strike against South Korea and the U.S., including the American homeland, over the two nations’ joint military exercises.
In a statement Monday on the official Korean Central News Agency, Pyongang said the annual military exercises were a pretext for war, and that the situation on the peninsula had been brought to a boil by last week’s United Nations sanctions against North Korea.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bhoasia; kimjongun; nknukes; nkthreats; northkorea; nuclearwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Somebody is throwing a temper tantrum.
1
posted on
03/06/2016 3:12:08 PM PST
by
rdl6989
2
posted on
03/06/2016 3:12:42 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; SunkenCiv
3
posted on
03/06/2016 3:14:11 PM PST
by
rdl6989
To: rdl6989
One wonders what China would think, a massive portion of it’s economic driver gone in minutes.
one thing is for sure, north korea would no longer be dark at night
It would be glowing.
4
posted on
03/06/2016 3:15:40 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: rdl6989
You have to appreciate the little twerps willingness to warn us . . . the least little heat signature coming from NORK should be enough to turn them into glass . . . oh, scratch that - I suspect Barrrrack has decided to go 24x7 to his flying fortress. Wonder if he’ll take Michael?
5
posted on
03/06/2016 3:17:59 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: DoughtyOne
6
posted on
03/06/2016 3:18:25 PM PST
by
Citizen Zed
("Freedom costs a buck o five" - Gary Johnston, TAWP)
To: Citizen Zed
What is Korean for “over charge”?
7
posted on
03/06/2016 3:20:46 PM PST
by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: rdl6989
Does Chia Chub need go to bed without any dinner LOL!
8
posted on
03/06/2016 3:21:03 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
(We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
To: Pilgrim's Progress
That was so bizarre - who in the world calls their wife “Michael”?
That was a rhetorical question, mind you.
9
posted on
03/06/2016 3:21:08 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: DoughtyOne
....north Korea would no longer be dark at night
It would be glowing.
Wrong, it would no longer exist!!
10
posted on
03/06/2016 3:21:10 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: DoughtyOne
Problem is.....so would portions of S. Korea (along the border?)....plus there’s that pesky radiation factor. No...I doubt that Obama would ever use nukes against N. Korea. Even if they did ‘nuke us first’.
11
posted on
03/06/2016 3:22:32 PM PST
by
XenaLee
(The only good commie is a dead commie)
To: Citizen Zed
12
posted on
03/06/2016 3:23:41 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: rdl6989; Old Sarge; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; TWhiteBear; ...
North Korea threatened a pre-emptive nuclear strike against South Korea and the U.S., including the American homeland, over the two nations’ joint military exercises.
13
posted on
03/06/2016 3:25:13 PM PST
by
LucyT
To: Pilgrim's Progress
Do you really think hussein would respond with nukes? I’ll bet he’ll surrender.
14
posted on
03/06/2016 3:28:29 PM PST
by
Eagles6
( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
To: SaveFerris
Good thing it is rhetorical. ‘Cuz do you really have to ax?
15
posted on
03/06/2016 3:28:58 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: rdl6989
16
posted on
03/06/2016 3:29:14 PM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(Rubio: All the slipperiness of Bill Clinton, with none of the smarts.)
To: XenaLee
The EMP damage on South Korea alone would probably be a big problem.
17
posted on
03/06/2016 3:29:16 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: Pilgrim's Progress
18
posted on
03/06/2016 3:29:35 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: DoughtyOne
“one thing is for sure, north korea would no longer be dark at night. It would be glowing.”
Well, one would hope. But with Obama as CIC....
19
posted on
03/06/2016 3:29:42 PM PST
by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: XenaLee
Hasn’t 0bama already stated that he would not retaliate in the event of a nuclear attack? Early on in his candidacy I believe.
20
posted on
03/06/2016 3:30:16 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
