Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Problem is.....so would portions of S. Korea (along the border?)....plus there’s that pesky radiation factor. No...I doubt that Obama would ever use nukes against N. Korea. Even if they did ‘nuke us first’.


11 posted on 03/06/2016 3:22:32 PM PST by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: XenaLee

The EMP damage on South Korea alone would probably be a big problem.


17 posted on 03/06/2016 3:29:16 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: XenaLee

Hasn’t 0bama already stated that he would not retaliate in the event of a nuclear attack? Early on in his candidacy I believe.


20 posted on 03/06/2016 3:30:16 PM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: XenaLee

The only reason nuclear weapons are in our arsenal are for much bigger players than N. Korea - we would not waste or impact on the planet nuclear detonations on a piss ant little country like N. Korea..

There’s no need - we could end them in a heart beat and they know it and our nukes would still sit silent at the ready..


23 posted on 03/06/2016 3:32:57 PM PST by acw011 (Great Goooogly Mooogly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson