National Review: Jeff Sessions Is a ‘Prostitute’ for Endorsing Donald Trump

Breitbart ^ | March 1, 2016 | Matthew Boyle

[C19fan]

National Review, a once-venerable conservative publication, has officially gone off the rails entirely, publishing an article calling Sen. Jeff Sessions a “prostitute” for endorsing billionaire Donald Trump for the GOP presidential nomination.

That abominable attack on perhaps the most revered conservative in the U.S. Senate ran in a National Review piece arguing that anyone who endorses Trump is a “rat” that is “scurrying” and is also a “sellout.”

[nikos1121]

Who posted it?

[Altura Ct.]

National Review would certainly know about being a prostitute.

[Wpin]

The National Review is making itself irrelevant by their shameful editorials decrying Trump and his supporters.

[BigSkyFreeper]

WFB must be spinning in his grave.

[mad_as_he$$]

National Enquirer is right; sometimes.

[TornadoAlley3]

Voters obviously care nothing about NR or any gubmint official ranting against Trump.

[StormEye]

"Was not aware that National Review was for open borders, ..."

They've been for swamping America with illegals for some time now.

[Uncle Miltie]

National Review is an embarrassment.

WFB is spinning in his grave.

[Biggirl]

Read that NR was sold to a liberal.

[CAluvdubya]

Good to know what they REALLY REALLY seek.

This election has certainly been a bridge burning one. If nothing else, Trump has exposed our true enemies from within.

[grania]

Mygosh, it's an unwritten Commandment for Constitutional Conservatives. We just do not in any way show disrespect for Senator Jeff Sessions.

It's shocking how out of touch the elite are with their voting fodder.

[Hattie]

Sessions + Planned Parenthood Trump = big disappointment to me.

[alloysteel]

Not insane, probably, but terribly vindictive.

The myth that grace and good manners will gain acceptance
everywhere is just that, a myth. Nice guys finish last.

For sure, Herself would NEVER win an endorsement for polite
good manners, and since this is now the rule of engagement,
whoever the Republicans put up will have to go for the
jugular, in no uncertain terms. This is a death match,
winner take all.

Be the lion, or live as sheep for a hundred years.

[mulligan]

And the National Review is not? It became a ‘rag’ some time ago.

[NonValueAdded]

Solve the energy crisis; harness the spinning corpse of WFB Jr. But it will take some prodigious equipment to step the RPM rate down to a manageable level.

[Lisbon1940]

Yes, but has it officially gone off the rails?

[VanDeKoik]

National Enquirer doesn’t put you to sleep, and you only need to read it for 6 minutes before you need to put your groceries on the conveyor belt.

[Trumpinator]

The National Review = the Pravda of the GOPe.

[CAluvdubya]

What’s the difference between National Review and National Enquirer?

The National Enquirer is more journalistic.

[Tucker39]

It’s time for NR to go down the tubes like some other smearsheets have done and are slowly doing.