I just want a candidate who actually wants people dying in the streets.
Shameless attempt to take something out of context.
COOPER: Repealed and there’s no mandate for everybody to have insurance, what’s to - why would insurance company (sic) not have a pre-existing - insure somebody who has a pre-existing condition ...
Is that really what he said word for word?
Shameless attempt to re-write the question to say what yo want to hear not what it actually says.
In context the question is “how to cover pre existing contituions”, not the over all mandate which, when you listen to the whole town hall, Trump makes clear he would repeal.
Excellent Graphic.
Stop it with your keeping things in an honest context! /s
Yes. We do have to figure out a way to help people. The healthcare system was out of control before Obamacare and Obama made it worse.
So you chose to cling to the lie pumped out by the campaign bots rather then bother learning inconvenient facts that challenge your emotional dogmas?
You don’t get to ignore the context of the question in order to manufacture an attack line. When you do, people are going to point out that you are lying.
Candidates come and go, a reputation as a liar follows publications, and authors,around for the rest of their lives.
Don’t believe me? Have a chat with Dan Rather.
When you point out some scripture or statement to a religious cultist that contradicts their religious beliefs, they invariably accuse you of taking the statement out of context.
Then they give some lame explanation of how “in the proper context” their religious position is not contradicted.
There is no reasonable doubt regarding the context in which Trump said he likes The Mandate. But religious cultists are not subject to reason. They have made up their minds, don’t confuse them with the facts.