Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FIX IS IN: PBS Moderators Ignore Clinton Scandals
Breitbart ^ | 11 Feb 2016 | Peter Schweizer

Posted on 02/12/2016 3:40:49 AM PST by detective

So let me get this straight: on the same day that the Washington Post reports that the State Department issued subpoenas to a family foundation bearing Hillary Clinton's name as part of a federal investigation, the PBS debate moderators didn't ask her about it.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Vermont; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; berniesanders; blackberry; canada; clinton; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; defundnpr; defundpbs; demagogicparty; districtofcolumbia; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; humaabedin; iran; libya; memebuilding; newyork; pages; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; tedcruz; texas; treygowdy; trump; uranium; vermont; waronterror; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
MSM continue to cover up truth to help Hillary Clinton.
1 posted on 02/12/2016 3:40:49 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Money train stops when you go against the hag and her team


2 posted on 02/12/2016 3:44:12 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

There’s an outside chance that many of her constituents will see through it this time around. The woman is bad news; pure evil.


3 posted on 02/12/2016 3:44:38 AM PST by ransacked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Crap house PBS needs to have it’s funding cut off!


4 posted on 02/12/2016 3:46:27 AM PST by Mr Apple (google: JEFFREY EPSTEIN BILL 'TWITCHIN' HANDS CLINTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Any “debate” already has its marching orders. Try to destroy every Republican. Enhance every Democratic. Especially a minority socialist.


5 posted on 02/12/2016 4:00:59 AM PST by Kudsman (Beware the disruptors! Are they REALLY supporting a candidate, or are they gop-e or rat operatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The Four elephants in the room PBS couldn’t see .

1) Bengazi

2) eMail server

3) Classified documents

4) Bribing Reporters


6 posted on 02/12/2016 4:02:47 AM PST by Lionheartusa1 ()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Clinton —> Scandals —> PBS = NOTHING BURGER.

Funny thing, some even here expected a Big Mac and did not even get a Whopper. Just a Nothing Burger.


7 posted on 02/12/2016 4:03:45 AM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

If PBS didn’t not mention something, then it did not happen or does not exist. Attempting to mention that oversight to any liberal/socialist will only elicit cries of outrage at suggesting such a slander to be followed by tears and personal attacks.

Like:
“HRC is as honest as the day is long and her email is none of anybody’s business - so there you vile racist, woman-hating pig!”


8 posted on 02/12/2016 4:07:24 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Breathtakingly obvious isn’t it?

There is no mainstream journalism in the nation anymore.
Maybe there never was and freedom of the press was just another government lie


9 posted on 02/12/2016 4:07:25 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

” no bank too big to fail, no executive too big to jail”
HRC at NH victory screech


10 posted on 02/12/2016 4:08:49 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

But we did get a happy meal!
Socialist style!
You pay extra tax on the toy and get a 2 page warning notice about the calories in the French fries


11 posted on 02/12/2016 4:10:57 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Ha ha that is what they are worried about!! Missing the annual “donation” to PBS from The Clinton Foundation!!!


12 posted on 02/12/2016 4:27:21 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

Compare the media interest in Clinton’s clear breach of national security, vs. Christie’s bridge closing fiasco.


13 posted on 02/12/2016 4:29:36 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Blame the GOP for public funding of PBS. They’ve controlled the power of the purse since January 2011.

PBS is an example of funding that should be easy to cut. Only a handful of voters would vote against Republicans for “privatizing” PBS. Almost all of those voters would be leftists who wouldn’t vote Republican anyway.

What would actually happen if PPS was privatized?

1). There would be more and longer commercials. In recent years announcements of commercial sponsorship of shows have been morphing into commercial messages anyway.
2). It would have to become competitive.
3). For a time wealthy individuals and foundations would continue to subsidize some programming.
4). Most American voters won’t care since they don’t watch PBS.
5). Congressmen and Senators who voted to privatize PBS will be criticized at cocktail parties by intellectuals and wealthy donors who watch the network.

Reason #5 is why the network has not been refunded. PBS is a government welfare program that benefits primarily the upper 1%.


14 posted on 02/12/2016 4:30:24 AM PST by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

Who was it that said something about “a willing suspension of disbelief”?


15 posted on 02/12/2016 4:33:38 AM PST by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“We can’t discuss that, because it’s under investigation...”

The trick is to keep everything under constant investigation.


16 posted on 02/12/2016 4:50:17 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
PBS is a government welfare program that benefits primarily the upper 1%.

My beef is that PBS is Slanted to the Left in everything they do!
PBS sucks as far as I'm concerned.

17 posted on 02/12/2016 5:00:28 AM PST by Mr Apple (google: JEFFREY EPSTEIN BILL TWITCHIN' FINGERS CLINTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Good idea.


18 posted on 02/12/2016 5:17:38 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

No surprise.

Although I did not watch the debate, I used to watch some of the PBS ‘news’ and political discussions. They were not much different than the network news in their political leanings and preferences.

==

Turned on Fox&Friends for the morning headlines. Geraldo and Judge Jeanine were going at it over the Hillary email scandal. Care to take a guess as which one was defending Hillary and claiming the ‘scandal’ was much about nothing?


19 posted on 02/12/2016 5:21:39 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Hillary already has the super delegates to put her over the top.

A question I would have asked Clinton is, “It is obvious that all you need to so is show up and you are the nomiee due to your overwhelming majority of super delegates. Would you give up all your super delegates and take on Sanders on an even playing field?”

That is the question that needs to be asked.


20 posted on 02/12/2016 6:19:42 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Trump/Cruz war is a media generated war so the establishment can stay in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson