Posted on 02/09/2016 5:19:02 AM PST by Kaslin
Just those that vote for Hillary would work for me...: )
Have you ever seen the obstacle course the females run in basic compared to the one the males run? And that’s for females who want to be there.
TED Cruz did say it is the height of Political correctness and is against it
The author forgets that liberals do not live in reality but inside their own Utopian world between their ears. Facts / truth do not matter to them.
Letting women serve in combat arms is the ultimate height of stupidity.
If women were forced to sign up for the draft, it would be a logical result of saying women are eligible for all combat roles. What it would do is cause women to stop and actually think about it. If they do, I’d wager that most women would say that combat roles for women is not a good idea.
Maybe the men hating feminazis would then shut up. They want “equal” treatment, I say give them equal treatment. What is the difference anyway? I would rather have females than some of the male fairies in there now.
There ain’t gonna be no draft. It takes an act of congress. The rats can float the idea all they want(Charlie Rangle). The subject raises eye brows among the young and that’s intentional. Some one needs to call them out on it.
It might be the only way to end the stupidity of forcing the military to open combat positions for women.
\Agreed.
I get so fed up of hearing how if women can do the job then they should join.
First most women cannot march with over 50 pound 30 miles over rough terrain in 8 hours.
Secondly even if they could people seem to forget that unit cohesiveness gets destroyed.
We had a woman with us and half the guys were flirting with her and she was flirting back.
Some said they would carry some of her equi9pement while others said she should carry it all seeing as it is hers.
Add the factor of men now can’t make certain jokes , say certain things in front of her , because she will take offence .
How about if she feels victimized.
The reality is that it is about getting the job done,being treated the very same, and unit cohesiveness .
The fact that the women went to ranger school and failed only to be given another chance to get special treatment which the Army denies , but have lost the records for her YEA RIGHT!. Shows us women should not be in a combat unit.
Anyone here knows in a combat unit of they have served it is different than being out as a civilian. The way of life, sense of humor etc.
Women in combat units is another way to change the military and destroy it.
Agreed.
I get so fed up of hearing how if women can do the job then they should join.
First most women cannot march with over 50 pound 30 miles over rough terrain in 8 hours.
Secondly even if they could people seem to forget that unit cohesiveness gets destroyed.
We had a woman with us and half the guys were flirting with her and she was flirting back.
Some said they would carry some of her equi9pement while others said she should carry it all seeing as it is hers.
Add the factor of men now canât make certain jokes , say certain things in front of her , because she will take offence .
How about if she feels victimized.
The reality is that it is about getting the job done,being treated the very same, and unit cohesiveness .
The fact that the women went to ranger school and failed only to be given another chance to get special treatment which the Army denies , but have lost the records for her YEA RIGHT!. Shows us women should not be in a combat unit.
Anyone here knows in a combat unit of they have served it is different than being out as a civilian. The way of life, sense of humor etc.
I’m really sick of hearing of all the idiots pushing women into combat roles. Nobody I have ever known who actually experienced combat would even consider it. I am a combat veteran and I am absolutely against it.
1. Very few if any women have the real killer instinct men have as a gift of their testosterone.
2. Women are a lethal distraction to combat unit. Attraction will happen and that will drastically erode unit cohesion and any semblance of combat efficiency. Sergeant A will have the hots for PFC B who in turn has only eyes for Lance Corporal C. Imagine the disasters when the two on Listening Post are having sex rather than listening. Idiocy.
Sending our daughters into an environment they aren’t suited for and never designed to fulfill is great fun for liberals and enemy agents but bad news for our country.
I wouldn’t even make it through the first day in basic training, perhaps not even the first few hours.
Correct. Do the girls want equal protection of the law? Let them have it. Why should 18 year old males have to sign up and 18 year old females not? It’s plainly discrimination on the basis of sex, is it not? Why should the girls get a free ride?
Combat billets are less than 15% (closer to 10, IIRC) of the total of military forces. The rest are support positions.
The only reason women have not been eligible for the draft is they have been excluded from combat positions, the courts ruled on this. Now that our military has been “transformed” by the current admin, this is no longer the case.
If the draft is challenged for being discriminatory in that is is based solely on sex, it will be quickly changed to a universal draft, sex will not be a factor.
Feminists are getting what they want, I hope they choke on it.
It is registering for selective service, not signing up for the draft. Since feminists want all the privileges but none of the duties, this law must be changed so it applies to all.
If we keep using the same tactics we will keep losing this cultural war.
If they want women in combat roles then they get everything that goes along with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.