Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Iowa loss could mean trouble ahead
The Washington Examiner ^ | February 2, 2016 | Byron York

Posted on 02/02/2016 5:31:18 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa -- Donald Trump's supporters showed up at the Sheraton Monday night fully expecting their man to win the Iowa caucuses. And why shouldn't they? Trump had held a lead of varying sizes in 13 of the last 13 polls listed in the RealClearPolitics average of Iowa polls. How could that not win?

"Beats the hell out of me," said Michelle Tepley, a Trump fan from Waukee. "It doesn't make any sense."

"Sad," said Kimberly Hawn of West Des Moines.

"I don't know, I don't know," said Steve Brewer of Norwalk.

Months ago, before Trump took the lead in Iowa, a number of analysts argued that he wasn't a "good fit" for the state's Republican electorate, made up heavily of voters who describe themselves as born-again evangelical Christians. Then Trump took the lead and -- in the polls at least -- fought off challenges from Ben Carson and eventual winner Ted Cruz. So analysts thought Trump might not be so bad a fit after all.

But on caucus night, some of Trump's supporters returned to the old "bad fit" theory to explain Trump's surprise loss.

"It was the evangelicals," said Dick Stoffer of West Des Moines. "They've done it before -- they did it four years before with Santorum, they did it with Huckabee before that."

"The evangelicals," said Carol Anne Tracy of West Des Moines. "We've got a lot of evangelicals, and I just don't think they felt that [Trump] praised God enough."

"It's happened before -- the guy with the biggest Bible wins Iowa," said Ken Crow, a Tea Party activist from Winterset.

The caucus results -- Trump soundly beaten by Cruz, finishing barely ahead of Marco Rubio -- seemed to confirm another nagging suspicion about the Trump campaign: that it had not paid sufficient attention to turning out its voters.

Most of the people at the Trump event had attended caucuses earlier in the evening. At those caucuses, the presiding officer asked whether there was a representative from each campaign present to speak, and, if not, whether anyone attending would like to speak on a particular candidate's behalf. At the caucus I attended, in Pleasant Hill, a suburb just east of Des Moines, there was no one to speak for Trump -- no representative of the campaign -- and no voter willing to stand up and speak on his behalf. (The precinct ended in a Cruz landslide: 110 votes for the Texas senator, versus 36 for Trump and 34 for Rubio.)

At the Sheraton, some Trump supporters had similar stories.

"We were at a caucus and Trump didn't even have anyone there to speak for him," one man told me.

"That's insane," added a man nearby.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; cruzingtohillarywins; cruzjihad; gopprimary; holywarriorsforcruz; iowa; pastortedschoir; tds; totalloserted; trump; usualsuspect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2016 5:31:18 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

* yawn *


2 posted on 02/02/2016 5:32:09 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Trump and Cruz will split the more conservative votes to pave the way for GOPe boy rubio.


3 posted on 02/02/2016 5:32:30 AM PST by boycott (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Yeah, we all know how Huckabee and Santorum won in Iowa and breezed to the eventual nomination.

Oops, they didn't.

We'll see how this race looks after South Carolina.

4 posted on 02/02/2016 5:32:42 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Oh, Byron York. There’s an impartial observer.


5 posted on 02/02/2016 5:34:01 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It would have been worse for Trump if there had not been so many other candidates. Cruz took the “very conservative” vote from Trump by two to one.


6 posted on 02/02/2016 5:34:07 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Oba. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

We’ll see how this race looks after South Carolina.

Exactly! If Trump wins both, Cruz will be there to split the “anti-establishment” voters to pave the way for GOPe boy marco.


7 posted on 02/02/2016 5:35:17 AM PST by boycott (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Trump leads in the next three states. NH by a lot.

Rubio is a distant 2nd there. Cruz is nowhere to be seen.

Cruz has one delegate more than both Rubio and Trump. After NH, he will be in 3rd.

Even if Trump came in 1st, he would still only have one more delegate than them.

So in the end, we can finally stop wasting time on a state that will vote for the Democrats in the fall anyway, and start the real race. One where you dont win by basically becoming a naturalized citizen of the state, like Iowa.


8 posted on 02/02/2016 5:35:50 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boycott

That’s what I’m afraid of


9 posted on 02/02/2016 5:35:59 AM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

He should not have skipped the debate. Now he’s branded as a loser.


10 posted on 02/02/2016 5:36:06 AM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Iowa was a throwaway for Trump.

Few things. 1)Cruz was supposed to win Iowa. It was tailor made for him and his campaign. 2)Trump is not an evangelical. He wasn’t winning Iowa. 3) What scared Trump wasn’t Cruz, but Rubio.

Now that they are moving on to NH, the Establishment candidates are in play. This is where Trump needs to prove he can win.


11 posted on 02/02/2016 5:37:16 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Trump/Cruz war is a media generated war so the establishment can stay in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The Cheap Labor Express and the architects of TPP and other job-destroying uniparty garbage know that Trump is their worst nightmare. The lockstep barrage of anti-Trump articles from the Salem-owned “conservative” online media has been very telling.

Whatever. If Cruz wins, I’ll vote for him. But I’m still voting for Trump when my primary voting rolls around. Cruz has proven that he will buckle under pressure in certain areas and side with the uniparty. I’d still rather take a chance on a candidate who isn’t beholden to anyone rather than a career politician.


12 posted on 02/02/2016 5:37:40 AM PST by 20yearsofinternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
NH and SC will be quite different.

This gives temporary momentum to Cruz, but the bigger issue is not the Cruz win, rather the Rubio surge.

The guy is going to absorb all the establishment/open borders money now.

It's a three way race, and it's likely Cruz and Rubio will go at each other during the next two primaries, to see if one can knock the other out.

Dicey, but kind of fun to watch.

13 posted on 02/02/2016 5:37:47 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Let’s go for the mole theory because this doesn’t ring quite right.


14 posted on 02/02/2016 5:37:59 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I doubt it. Last night’s result didn’t surprise me except that Rubio did much better and took lots of votes from Trump - by people who waited to make up their mind until they walked into their Precinct.

The bigger issue is that Cruz, not surprisingly, got 77% of the Evangelical vote. That won’t be the case in any of the remaining primaries coming up soon. So, no surprises last night and this isn’t close to being over.

The one big kicker is this - if the likes of Kasich, Christie, Paul and Bush (less likely) drop out after lousy showings in NH - where does their support go? Likely, it’ll all go to Rubio.


15 posted on 02/02/2016 5:38:06 AM PST by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
This primary is a long way from over. Counting out Trump at this point is sophistry.

As I see it, the only down side for Trump was how well Rubio did last night. The establishment is not going to go quietly, and Trump's ability to garner media attention may not be translating into votes as well as he would like and needs.

16 posted on 02/02/2016 5:39:13 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Trump and Cruz will split the more conservative votes to pave the way for GOPe boy rubio.

There's only one conservative in the race. Anybody voting for somebody other than Cruz should be asking themselves why they left conservatism behind.

17 posted on 02/02/2016 5:39:14 AM PST by dead ("I'm up to my eyeball in virgin goats!" - Mullah Omar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If I may, I’d like to ask you a question: what does it do to your life and your heart and your mind to do nothing but beat away at a somebody? It’s seem like first thing every morning you’re at it ... are you lonely or eaten up with hate or just bitter or lonely? I’ve never seen anything like it.

God bless you.


18 posted on 02/02/2016 5:39:40 AM PST by true believer forever (Trump 2016 - I never knew an entire country could have an ephiphany!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

That’s what I’m afraid of


That is exactly what is happening.

Also, Rubio’s people aren’t really running his campaign anymore. The GOPe is directing his campaign now.

The pro-amnesty GOPe and their Chamber buddies are great strategists. The establishment is paving the way for Marco.


19 posted on 02/02/2016 5:39:43 AM PST by boycott (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
What's the frequency, Kenneth?

He's dead, Jim


20 posted on 02/02/2016 5:40:01 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson