Posted on 01/31/2016 8:08:28 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Des Moines, Iowa -- 135,000.
That's the "magic number" to watch Monday night as Republican caucus-goers gather around the Hawkeye State to choose their presidential nominee, according to data collected and analyzed by numerous GOP campaign officials.
Four years ago, a record-breaking number of Iowans -- 121,503 -- participated in the Republican caucuses. If turnout exceeds 135,000 this year, GOP insiders agree, it will be an indication that Donald Trump has attracted a significant number of new voters to the caucuses. And if the increase is even more drastic -- say, upwards of 150,000, which some Republicans believe is possible -- then Trump will likely win.
But if turnout is below 135,000, Iowa will be Ted Cruz's to lose, for two reasons: Firstly, both public and internal polling shows that Cruz's supporters are, by and large, veterans of the caucus process, meaning their support can be counted on no matter what. Secondly, the Cruz campaign has poured massive resources into a field operation to successfully identify, persuade, and recruit voters. Cruz's team, with the help of advanced analytics and micro-targeting, has a very good idea of exactly who is going to show up and vote for them Monday night.
The same cannot be said for Trump. The question of whether the enthusiasm for his candidacy will translate into caucus attendance has loomed over Iowa's campaign for months. Republicans here have watched closely for signs of increased voter registration, but a report from the secretary of state's office on Thursday confirmed that there has not been any meaningful spike in the GOP voter rolls -- registration is up by nearly 3,000, but the total number is nearly identical to what it was in January 2012. (It's worth noting that voters can still register at their caucus precincts on Monday.)
"Ted Cruz's support is going to be there," says Iowa GOP chairman Jeff Kaufmann. The same can't necessarily be said for Trump supporters, he adds, "because they don't have a caucus history."
That hasn't stopped some Republicans from forecasting an enormous uptick in voter participation. Kaufmann has asked GOP officials around the state to prepare for as many as 170,000 caucus-goers, though he says he expects 150,000 or slightly less. The latter figure is being floated by Governor Terry Branstad, who has told allies that he expects shocking levels of participation on Monday.
Those are high-end estimates, however. Officials from many of the campaigns predict the number will fall somewhere between 125,000 and 140,000. A few even think the figure could remain relatively static at 122,000, arguing that Ron Paul drew many first-time caucus-goers in 2012 who won't be back this time.
"With all these candidates, all this turnout effort, it's logical that we'll have a record turnout. But it's illogical to think we'll double the record turnout or that it's going to go to 170,000," says Iowa representative Steve King, a Cruz supporter. "I think Cruz wins this in a close race, with a 135,000 turnout number as the over/under, and I think we go under that."
The Cruz campaign has done extensive modeling on the caucuses and believes the turnout will ultimately fall between 133,000 and 137,000. Republicans familiar with Cruz's analytics program say his team has modeled caucus electorates all the way up to 175,000 out of an abundance of caution, and feels confident that its man will prevail even if turnout reaches that high. The reason: Cruz will hold a lead of roughly 7,000 votes over Trump with a GOP electorate of 125,000, his allies say. Trump would need to win a huge plurality -- if not a majority -- of additional votes in order to offset Cruz's lead.
That logic holds for Cruz all the way up to 175,000; if turnout is higher than that, his allies concede, a Trump victory is likely assured.
Turnout projections from pollsters, while varying, demonstrate the danger a massive spike in caucus-goers poses for Cruz. Monmouth University, for example, released a poll this week forecasting a turnout of 170,000 Republicans, and showing Trump ahead of Cruz, 30 percent to 23 percent.
Cruz's team shrugged off that poll, arguing that a 50,000-voter increase is highly unlikely. Then came Saturday's release of the Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll, which showed Trump leading Cruz by five points, 28 percent to 23 percent. Cruz campaign manager Jeff Roe blasted the survey on Twitter, saying it forecasted a "386,000 turnout for GOP." Cruz's campaign has similarly criticized other recent polls with models projecting an electorate twice the size of what it was in 2012. "For the record, we may be leading at 250K-300K," Roe tweeted. "I would have no idea because we would never test at that turnout range."
Such a gigantic jump would not be unprecedented in Iowa: Democratic caucus turnout jumped from roughly 124,000 in 2004 to nearly 240,000 in 2008, thanks to Barack Obama's ability to new participants to the process. But in that case, the massive spike was predicted by an enormous increase in voter registration, from roughly 533,000 registered Democrats in 2004 to more than 606,000 four years later.
So far there has been no such spike in the GOP numbers ahead of the 2016 caucuses. There were 614,913 registered Republicans in January 2012, according to the secretary of state's office. When the up-to-date figures were released Thursday, GOP registration remained virtually unchanged at 615,066.
-- Tim Alberta is the chief political correspondent for National Review.
I’d much prefer Cruz, but I’ll take Trump over Jethro any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
I agree that higher turnout is better for Trump than for Cruz but I do not take it as a given that Cruz will automatically win a low-turnout caucus on Monday.
I think there is more switching sides than we are being led to believe.
I think you are right. The bloom is off the Cruz rose. His votes are going to migrate to Trump and Rubio, probably more to Rubio.
The big reason is that there was little reason to be excited.
Bland, “my turn”, and low-energy candidates made it a boring affair.
” Tim Alberta is the chief political correspondent for National Review.”
All you need to know about this article! National Review
lol, a little data is always nice ;-)
His votes are going to migrate to Trump and Rubio, probably more to Rubio.
I dunno, if the mailing is indicative of the new, mean, street-fighting Cruz, he might pick up a few points.
Interesting numbers... what will it mean to the National Review if Trump takes it with less than 135,000 people attending the caucus? They have hedged their bets in he article however. It does seem like there is more enthusiasm for the election this year than normal so if Trump wins they will most likely be saying “see we told you so” despite this article being in line with their anti-Trump manifesto issue.
10s of 1000s attend Trump rallies, but they might stay home rather than caucus?
Media has been whispering that narrative — Trump supporters might stay home instead of voting for him — for weeks.
If someone stood hours in the cold to get into one of his rallies, it is more than highly likely that that person will show up to vote for him.
Registrations ahead of the caucus do not portend any unprecedented participation numbers. There’s no real reason why enthusiastic newbies wouldn’t register ahead of time in significant numbers if they had significant numbers.
Of course, Trump could win by attracting votes from a large number of party regulars, but that does not seem the route his supporters are predicting.
Did I miss something? NR already published their opus.
Agree.
Lot of Cruz voters will be switching. Probably to Rubio.
The hardcore Cruzaders laugh at the suggestion that Ted may not only lose to Trump in Iowa, but finish behind Rubio too. Well why then does the Cruz campaign and the money behind it put out commercials targeting Rubio specifically? Why aim that time and money on the guy percieved to finish third? I think that tells us that Cruz’s internal numbers aren’t very good right now, but we’ll find out tomorrow.
Bused in out of state participants would register on the same day. Isn't that how that worked four years ago for Obama?
Figures someone named Alberta is pro-Cruz...
yeah he’s up 41% to 12% over Cruz in the new Reuters poll nationally,,
if this was a sports game they would have called it already because of the the “Mercy Rule”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.