Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WH: Clinton Won't Be Indicted 'Based On What We Know'
The Weekly Standard ^ | January29,2016 | DANIEL HALPER

Posted on 01/29/2016 5:52:25 PM PST by Hojczyk

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said today that "based on what we know" it does not look like Hillary Clinton will be indicted. Earnest made the remarks the White House podium.

A reporter asked, "Can you say with certainty and confidence that Secretary Clinton will not be indicted because of this email scandal

"That will be a decision made by the Department of Justice and prosecutors over there," said Earnest. "What I know that some officials over there have said is that she is not a target of the investigation. So that does not seem to be the direction that it's trending.

But I'm certainly not going to weigh in on a decision or in that process in any way. That is a decision to be made solely by independent prosecutors but again, based on what we know from the Department of Justice, it does not seem to be headed in that direction."

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bananarepublic; clinton; coverup; joshearnest; obamasfault; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2016 5:52:25 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Back in the Watergate days, that would have been called “a non-denial denial”.


2 posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:15 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Yep, not a real shocker here. The Regime has her covered.


3 posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:24 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

We may yet be surprised,but I’d say that the fix is in.


4 posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:39 PM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

He said all of this while not weighing in. I mean he is right, she will never be indicted but that says absolutely nothing about her criminality.


5 posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:50 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This country is more corrupt than a banana republic if that old cow skates off cackling again.


6 posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:56 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

What’d anyone expect him to say ?


7 posted on 01/29/2016 5:55:44 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Anyone who thinks THIS administration is going to allow anything to happen to Killery is a fool.


8 posted on 01/29/2016 5:55:45 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Based on the fact that its Hillary Clinton and thus she can get away with anything.


9 posted on 01/29/2016 5:55:55 PM PST by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

10 posted on 01/29/2016 5:56:28 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Translation:

"The fix is in..."


11 posted on 01/29/2016 5:57:42 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah: Satan's current alias. "Obama": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
The Weekly Standard is weak.

Catherine Herridge reported today that elements in the FBI and DoJ were very upset with those statements because Earnest has no line into either agency to know one way or the other. She also said Ubama didn't either when he made similar statements.

12 posted on 01/29/2016 5:58:59 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It was never just “lying about sex,” was it, Hillary?

HF


13 posted on 01/29/2016 5:59:03 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Well, anyway, whatever. Maybe information will be leaked to the foreign press, even if nothing happens here, I don’t imagine she will be well regarded anywhere else in the world.


14 posted on 01/29/2016 5:59:58 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If Hillary is not the Target woe be unto those that take the fall for her.


15 posted on 01/29/2016 6:00:18 PM PST by Gasshog (Newly discovered element Trumpamentium causes a Chain Reaction of Testicular Fortitude!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
But I'm certainly not going to weigh in on a decision or in that process in any way.

But he just did.

16 posted on 01/29/2016 6:01:16 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It’s safe to say that Hillary will Lose New Hampshire.
If she loses Iowa on Monday ...

... she’ll be indicted.

And Joe Biden will step in to save the day.


17 posted on 01/29/2016 6:02:47 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
"What I know that some officials over there have said is that she is not a target of the investigation."

Huh??? Then who IS the target? Who had the private server, Josh?

18 posted on 01/29/2016 6:03:40 PM PST by azishot (I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

so .. the question would be .. based on what we know ... why is she NOT a target?


19 posted on 01/29/2016 6:04:58 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“What we know” means Hillary has so much shit on Obama that Obama would go down with her.


20 posted on 01/29/2016 6:05:05 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson