Catherine Herridge reported today that elements in the FBI and DoJ were very upset with those statements because Earnest has no line into either agency to know one way or the other. She also said Ubama didn't either when he made similar statements.
It was a non-answer. IOW, it was a made up, evasive answer that goes no where.
LOL! He doesn’t need a line to them since he already knows the outcome. Message sent regardless. Not to mention nobody on the lynch mob will call for convening a grand jury. Treason? Pffffttt!
Earnest did say “based on what we know” which per Herridge is ‘nothing’ so technically, no indictments because they have no knowledge of anything she could be indicted on officially from the FBI. Earnest is playing word games. Dana Perino said he should shut up & say he will make no comment on the topic & ‘call the FBI’ (who will also say ‘no comment’).
Sheesh .... what a mess .... just like everything Hillary touches. Before this is over, the ‘body count’ for which she is responsible during her political career will be even higher (adding blown human intel sources to go along with Benghazi, Foster, Arkancides, etc.).
“Catherine Herridge reported today that elements in the FBI and DoJ were very upset with those statements.”
The DOJ and FBI are staying in character to the end. They have to keep up appearances.