Posted on 01/26/2016 8:53:04 AM PST by SeekAndFind
In the century of stupidity in which we now live, the opening remarks of just about any authority figure and/or journalist covering an act of jihad are likely to contain a pronouncement of what the act is not. And what they claim it isn’t is just about always what it is. What it is = jihad, Islamic terror, Islamic supremacy, Quran-inspired violence against non-believers, barbaric 7th-century practices. Take your pick. It all leads to the same dark place.
So recently, when a colonizer stabbed a Swedish woman to death, the rule noted above was on display, as CNN’s report began: “A 15-year-old asylum seeker stabbed a refugee center worker to death Monday in Sweden in an incident that’s not being classified as terrorism, police say.”
Hold that thought for just a moment, because I’ll come back to it.
The CNN video that accompanies the story starts out with this commentary:
They say they have quite a lot of young migrants coming to the country. That in their asylum centers, such as this one, it’s not unusual to have violence – mostly it’s between the refugees or the migrant themselves – and the police get called in and they say that is a major distraction. But this comes hard on the heels of just a few weeks ago when a young refugee stabbed a school boy. It’s the sort of thing that at this very sensitive time inflames passions before the police can even get to the bottom of precisely what happened here.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
(1) This is not an act of terror, and (2) the police have yet to "get to the bottom of precisely what happened."
How can you know what something is or isn't if the investigation's not complete, no less barely even underway?
You can't. Yet we see this idiotic pattern occur time and again with respect to Islamic terror.
Century of stupidity is right. We are not allowed to criticize our habitual attackers (Muslims) or name our real enemy (Islamic ideology followed and supported by billions of Muslims around the world), and we are shamed as bigoted and hateful if we do.
How do you accidentallu stab someone...to death. And how many times did he accidentally stab her? The statistical probability would be enormously high and then skyrocket for multiples.
The governments of germany and sweden brought the savages in, and don’t want to admit that they are responsible for the savagery.
Here, as everywhere, political correctness leads to innocent people being killed, injured or raped.
The term “colonizer” was used to describe the assailant which term should properly be used is “conqueror.”
The article does make a good point. Anytime the media feels the need to point out that an incident was not an act of terrorism it’s almost always an act of islamic terrorism.
“In the century of stupidity in which we now live...”
I love this. Really, it says it all, succinctly.
He didn’t do the stabbing. It was the knife’s fault. Bad knife just jumped into his hand and propelled the hand toward her. Time to ban knives, swords, sporks, forks, sticks, knitting needles, pencils and all other pointy objects.
Sort of like the muslim who was exonerated of rape because he accidentally fell on the woman ...
The irony about this incident is that the victim was a 22 year-old woman who immigrated to Sweden from Lebanon. Go figure.
My BSmeter broke...
“and we are shamed as bigoted and hateful if we do.”
If you want to stop those accusations, call the leftist a Nazi and watch his head spin around while spitting green pea soup. Works everytime. Without fail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
