(1) This is not an act of terror, and (2) the police have yet to "get to the bottom of precisely what happened."
How can you know what something is or isn't if the investigation's not complete, no less barely even underway?
You can't. Yet we see this idiotic pattern occur time and again with respect to Islamic terror.
Century of stupidity is right. We are not allowed to criticize our habitual attackers (Muslims) or name our real enemy (Islamic ideology followed and supported by billions of Muslims around the world), and we are shamed as bigoted and hateful if we do.
How do you accidentallu stab someone...to death. And how many times did he accidentally stab her? The statistical probability would be enormously high and then skyrocket for multiples.
The governments of germany and sweden brought the savages in, and don’t want to admit that they are responsible for the savagery.
Here, as everywhere, political correctness leads to innocent people being killed, injured or raped.
The term “colonizer” was used to describe the assailant which term should properly be used is “conqueror.”
The article does make a good point. Anytime the media feels the need to point out that an incident was not an act of terrorism it’s almost always an act of islamic terrorism.
“In the century of stupidity in which we now live...”
I love this. Really, it says it all, succinctly.
Sort of like the muslim who was exonerated of rape because he accidentally fell on the woman ...
The irony about this incident is that the victim was a 22 year-old woman who immigrated to Sweden from Lebanon. Go figure.
My BSmeter broke...
