Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JOSEPH FARAH: TRUMP AND THE NATIONAL REVIEW IRRELEVANTS
World Net Daily ^ | 1/24/2016 | JOSEPH FARAH

Posted on 01/24/2016 4:29:52 PM PST by Fhios

Exclusive: Joseph Farah asks if GOP front-runner is

The National Review rounded up a couple dozen “conservatives” to denounce Donald Trump and tell the world what it already knows – Trump is not a “movement conservative.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: trump; wrathofkahn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Not one bad thing said about another candidate.
1 posted on 01/24/2016 4:29:52 PM PST by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Nice.


2 posted on 01/24/2016 4:32:35 PM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

How an Obscure Adviser to Pat Buchanan Predicted the Wild Trump Campaign in 1996

The Week dot com ^ Michael Brendan Dougherty
Posted on 1/20/2016, 2:17:11 AM by WayneLusvardi

Imagine giving this advice to a Republican presidential candidate: What if you stopped calling yourself a conservative and instead just promised to make America great again?

What if you dropped all this leftover 19th-century piety about the free market and promised to fight the elites who were selling out American jobs?

What if you just stopped talking about reforming Medicare and Social Security and instead said that the elites were failing to deliver better healthcare at a reasonable price?

What if, instead of vainly talking about restoring the place of religion in society something that appeals only to a narrow slice of Middle America. You simply promised to restore the Middle American core, the economic and cultural losers of globalization to their rightful place in America?

What if you said you would re store them as the chief clients of the American state under your watch, being mindful of their interests when regulating the economy or negotiating trade deals?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3385923/posts


3 posted on 01/24/2016 4:33:32 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Obama is living proof of the disaster of not sticking to the Wisdom of our Founding Fathers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Who did NR make the case for?


4 posted on 01/24/2016 4:34:13 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (I like Trump and Cruz. Leave me the heck alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

5 posted on 01/24/2016 4:35:58 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Trumpbots Vs. Cruznadians - the struggle is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Wow, look at this one (post 5). Worse than the other one.


6 posted on 01/24/2016 4:39:47 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fhios
This is a good description of why Trump could up end the GOP as well as the Democratic establishment - what people deride as the Uniparty:

"Trump, should he be the nominee, and I am not endorsing him, is the only Republican candidate who could potentially realign the national political landscape and win a Reaganesque-style landslide – even winning states thought, for the last 28 years, to be impossible for Republican candidates to win.

Let’s not forget that a big part of America’s political problem is the Republican Congress. For the last seven years, ever since Republicans won the House in 2010, and even more so when they won the Senate in 2012, the Congress has been in total appeasement mode – giving Barack Obama everything he needed to “fundamentally transform America” in his own image.

Like him or hate him, Trump is where he is as a frontrunner right now because of that – the total capitulation of the Republican Congress and leadership – as much as he’s there because of Obama’s failed policies."

Take it or leave it. There's a good deal of truth to the fact the GOP Congress has failed to stand up to Obama and the American people are mad as hell and Trump for better or for worse - is their tribune. The National Review team has no answer to this national anger except to loudly denounce Trump. Where were they when the GOP nominated liberals McCain and Romney? They sure as hell held their peace which is why they have no credibility with conservatives.

I don't know what Trump would do if he became President but I do know the American people believe the country is heading in the wrong direction. You don't need to endorse Trump to understand Americans don't like the inevitable decline of America the establishment appears to accept as a given. Trump wants to reverse all that and people are told its impossible. Of course, the critics used to say that about Reagan.

7 posted on 01/24/2016 4:41:37 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Wow , Joseph Farah cheapshotting Thomas Sowell? I wish Sowell were running for President.


8 posted on 01/24/2016 4:42:03 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Good article. Thanks for posting.


9 posted on 01/24/2016 4:42:29 PM PST by datura (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
Yes, but who did NR make the case for in 2016. I know the title “Against Trump”. I did not read articles. Who do they say they are for? Cruz? Rubio?
10 posted on 01/24/2016 4:43:12 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (I like Trump and Cruz. Leave me the heck alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I agree with everything you say.


11 posted on 01/24/2016 4:43:27 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

kill shot vs Trump?
http://dcwhispers.com/is-fox-news-preparing-proverbial-kill-shot-against-trump-campaign/


12 posted on 01/24/2016 4:44:35 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

Well written rebuttal to the NR. They should have been on Mc Turdle and Boner all these years, and where were they?


13 posted on 01/24/2016 4:45:44 PM PST by Zenjitsuman (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

BTTT


14 posted on 01/24/2016 4:46:01 PM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Hope the Establishment feels the ouch of this one!


15 posted on 01/24/2016 4:46:33 PM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Sowell was the one name I hated seen includng with that NR gang. Very disappointing.


16 posted on 01/24/2016 4:47:19 PM PST by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Yes, but who did NR make the case for in 2016

National Review believes that they are the sole definer of what constitutes a conservative. Considering Glenn Beck is one of the contributors, they are obviously pulling for Cruz.

Dana Loesch is only on board as she took a snub from Trump's campaign personally and has had her panties in a wad ever since.

The rest are just trying to makes themselves relevant.

17 posted on 01/24/2016 4:48:41 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Trumpbots Vs. Cruznadians - the struggle is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aria

I haven’t read it myself, but did see his name listed as if he were Moe Howard.


18 posted on 01/24/2016 4:49:30 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
I bet Cruz's name does not exist in any of the articles. They do not want Trump or Cruz. Rubio is there man.
19 posted on 01/24/2016 4:51:33 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (I like Trump and Cruz. Leave me the heck alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

A good article.


20 posted on 01/24/2016 4:52:44 PM PST by PJBankard (It is the spirit of the men who leads that gains the victory. - Gen. George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson