Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Warns WaPo Reporter If They Run Story About Casino Bankruptcy, ‘I’m Suing You’
Mediaite ^ | January 18th, 2016 | Josh Feldman

Posted on 01/22/2016 5:14:15 AM PST by justlittleoleme

The Washington Post has a very in-depth report tonight about his role in the bankruptcy of his Taj Mahal Atlantic City casino back in 1991. They concluded that Trump has repeatedly “play[ed] down his personal role” in its downfall.

And Trump responded by warning the paper he might sue them.

The Post––which chronicles Trump’s history in the casino business––obtained documents showing plenty of the people he interacted with at the time were very bitter because of unfulfilled promises.

At one point, the report features Trump’s testimony before the Casino Control Commission years before, in which he argued to get a casino license. He said at one point, “It’s easier to finance if Donald Trump owns it. With me, they know there’s a certainty they would get their interest.”

And when asked if anything could go wrong, Trump mused, “We can have a depression. The world could collapse. We could have World War III. I mean, a lot of things can go wrong. I don’t think they will.”

The Taj opened in 1990, but in July 1991 the casino filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. And Trump had reportedly described himself as the “sole shareholder.”

Trump defended himself in a recent interview with WaPo, saying that his casinos were not the only ones that suffered at that time, and things got, well, very Trump-ian at one point:

He said the bankruptcy was the result of external forces beyond his control, specifically an extremely bad economy in 1990. He said he had “the prerogative” to change his mind about using junk bonds in the financing.

“I didn’t want to have any personal liability, so I used junk bonds. I accept the blame for that, but I would do it again,” he said. But Trump vehemently denied that the deal represented a personal failing or affected his personal wealth.

“This was not personal. This was a corporate deal,” he said. “If you write this one, I’m suing you.”

You can read the full WaPo report here.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corrupt; lawsuit; suing; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Sue here, sue there, sue everywhere.

Does anyone have the count of how many times Trump has threatened to sue someone?

If you search it on google you get about 37,400,000 results. I know alot of those are probably duplicate stories

In related news:

Trump: Ted Cruz is a nasty guy whom no one likes — and I might sue him myself over his eligibility

Might sue.... he might sue. In the debates didn't Trump say he wouldn't sue Cruz.

Trump for president... Litigator in Chief.

1 posted on 01/22/2016 5:14:15 AM PST by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

But when Trump wins he will donate the proceeds to charity.


2 posted on 01/22/2016 5:16:37 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

I have know problem with Trump being aggressive in pursuit of his legal business dealings. He is a leader a fighter and a winner. This is what we need right now.


3 posted on 01/22/2016 5:17:54 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

The art of the deal:
1. Make a bad deal
2. File. Bankruptcy
3. Threaten to sue anyone who writes about it


4 posted on 01/22/2016 5:19:26 AM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

If this old news is all they have to hitTrump with pretty weak.


5 posted on 01/22/2016 5:19:41 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Just imagine that bully with the full force of the US Just-Us Department behind him doing his dirty deeds. It won’t be “you’re fired.” It will be “ruin their lives”. “Arrest them”, “throw the bum in Jail”.

His Administration will be no different than Barkies. Litigate the Public into submission or investigate them into bankruptcy.

No One dare challenge the All Powerful Don.

Yeah he’s a real stand up guy... /s


6 posted on 01/22/2016 5:22:00 AM PST by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Would you prefer another George W. That just sat there and took it?


7 posted on 01/22/2016 5:22:16 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Think of President Trump threatening to sue while backed up by the power of the IRS.


8 posted on 01/22/2016 5:22:42 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

“Let me tell you..”

“NO! I don’t care. None of that matters. Trump will make America great again!”

There, I just summarized 80% of the current thread conversations on FR.


9 posted on 01/22/2016 5:24:02 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Press suppression? Sounds like a dimocratic tactic


10 posted on 01/22/2016 5:24:10 AM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Sounds a bit ‘Obamian’ to me.


11 posted on 01/22/2016 5:24:23 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Have you ever looked up his charitable contributions? You should do so and prepare to be amazingly underwhelmed.


12 posted on 01/22/2016 5:26:45 AM PST by Axeslinger (Trump: the Kaitlyn Jenner of conservatism. One's not a woman, one's not a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Why do you presume those are the only two choices?


13 posted on 01/22/2016 5:27:41 AM PST by Axeslinger (Trump: the Kaitlyn Jenner of conservatism. One's not a woman, one's not a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

When someone using their “newspaper” to attempt to harm you with fraudulent reporting, of course you tell them “I am going to sue you”.

If the Newspaper is sure of their facts, and not doing the standard sloppy drive by hit piece, they have nothing to fear of Trump. If the facts are really on their side, what is the Wash Po afraid of?


14 posted on 01/22/2016 5:29:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

The Donald, the Oligarch Maximus for whom the deals mean utilizing your back pocket politicians and your corporate lawyers and accountants.

Not to worry, though, for the Donald will make America great again with his tweets, fully leveraging his friend Putin, and applying the Best Book Ever Written(after the Bible, of course).


15 posted on 01/22/2016 5:31:59 AM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Public figures do not have the liability protections private people do. This is well established already. Others can dig into all manner of things in your past and insinuate all manner of things from it.

The same system that protects him while talking about Cruz’s birth, birthplace and birth certificate protects people who want to talk about bankruptcies and business ventures.


16 posted on 01/22/2016 5:38:37 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

It’s not as old as Cruz’s birth.


17 posted on 01/22/2016 5:40:11 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

to attempt to harm you with fraudulent reporting,

That is one very difficult hurdle for a political candidate to surpass.


18 posted on 01/22/2016 5:40:59 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
If the facts are really on their side, what is the Wash Po afraid of?

They were basically told to shut up unless they could put up.

I don't see a problem with that.

19 posted on 01/22/2016 5:50:20 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am a person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger

Oh you are right.

Choice 3: Lament at how the press is ignoring the issues important to Americans, and hope that they feel some sort of shame.


20 posted on 01/22/2016 5:52:31 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson