Posted on 12/10/2015 12:43:14 PM PST by MNJohnnie
The time for action is now. The Senate's switchborad, their emails needs to be flooded. This topic needs to be discussed on every Conservative Talk Radio show.
Dear Senator
If the GOP wishes to control the Senate after the 2016 elections, they best kill this bit of grandstanding PR nonsense quickly. The GOP Leadership of the US Senate could not be more out of touch with the will of the voters on this issue if they were actively trying.
Here is current law. Do not mess with it.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate
Passed. Dingy Hairy still runs the joint I guess
The Resolution passed a Committee. It has a LONG way to go before it can become law.
Didn’t we go to war in the Balkans where one side was (nominally) Christian and the other side (nominally) Muslim?
Didn’t Jimmy Carter ban Shia Muslims (Iranians, Persians) from entering the U.S.?
Doesn’t U.S. law currently ban the naturalization (if not the immigration) of persons who will not affirm their friendliness (in so many words) with the principles of liberty of the U.S., etc.?
Are the Quran and Hadith not inherently hostile to the principles of secular government, human liberty, democracy, etc.?
Yep, which is why the phones and emails of the idiots in the US Senate need to be shut down by the voice of the US People.
Hasn’t gotten to the US House, this was done under the table in the US Senate
Pass one in the House that rejects anyone who supports Sharia law then go to conference ...
I believe it is already not legal to ban immigrants based on religion- We can however ban someone based on their nationality IF their nationality poses a possible risk to our nation
Here is current law.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate
napolitan said yesterday there is a ‘religious clause’ that bars the US from barring refugees based on religion- but stressed that a president can bar people based on nationality
Jimma Carter barred people based on religion, and got away with it- He barred Shiites
Ban them based on their stated intent to overthrow the US and impose Sharia law.
Never mind “religion”...it isn’t one. Declare it as such.
Here are their opinions:
Sharia in America: "51% of U.S. Muslims (1.5M) ... polled believe ... that they should have the choice of American or Sharia courts" (1)
Reject U.S. Law: 61%. Only "39% of (U.S. Muslims, ~1.2M) said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts." (1) That means the other 61% (~1.8M) of U.S. Muslims believe they should not be subject to American courts.
Sharia Superiority: 33% of U.S. Muslims (~1M) believe that "If Sharia conflicts with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights", then Sharia "should be considered supreme." (1)
Violence against First Amendment Rights: 29% (~900,000) U.S. Muslims agree that "violence against those who insult the prophet mohammed, the quran, or the Islamic faith is sometimes acceptable." (1)
Sharia by Jihad: 11% of U.S. Muslims (~330,000) believe that Sharia is "The Muslims god allah's Law that Muslims must follow and impose world-wide via Jihad" (1)
(1) https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/
I believe he was referring to the first amendment, which is incorrect as it only applies to citizens.
who? Napolitano? The segment I heard him taking in he was talking about some law which prevents banning people based on religious belief then stated we could ban based on nationality instead, legally-
But Carter I believe banned Shiites specifically- during the iran hostage issue-
Olympia Snowe gave us Obama Care on a committee vote!
Islam needs to be recognized as a totalitarian political system which masquerades as a religion. One has to wonder what has to happen before the libtard secularists will recognize this clear reality.
To “recognize this clear reality” is to reject all they hold dear.
It won't happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.