Posted on 11/16/2015 9:12:48 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[A]uthor and political strategist Roger Stone about the horrors and abuses perpetrated by the Bush and Clinton crime families.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
You’ve got to be kidding...
You will, of course, be listing all the assertions made by Stone that are untrue. With evidence.
Didn’t he fire Stone? Was that just a ruse? Maybe.
Ping for later viewing.
Stone was hired for work preparatory to a campaign. He resigned primarily because his book was published. He couldn’t work for Trump and do a book tour. He also said his advice was not being taken. But he supports Trump for President.
Main thing: He was not fired.
Well I certainly just proudly took my tin foil hat off after watching this.I have for years thought Bush/Clinton are completely corrupt. I cannot for the life of me be happy about it,other than, I like being right. I was for years ago such a huge supporter of GW. When Jeb came on as a prez candidate and favored by the GOPe and of Hillary. I knew it was a done deal for the beast to win. Thanks for the post. This was very informative. I don’t know much about Stone. I do know this deal of BS camaraderie between the Clintons and the Bush is a real deal. I’ve followed this for quite awhile.I always thought they just have dirt on the other.Thanks for the post.
News sources claimed at the time they were told by the Trump campaign that Stone was fired. I just double-checked to make sure I did not misremember. He has continually touted Trump which made me wonder. Can’t always trust the news sources anyway.
Stone seems to be some weird guy that Trump fired after he criticized Trump over the McCain comments and supposedly quit (Trump says he fired him first), then goes around being even more hardcore pro-Trump. Trump actually had a tweet, commenting on all the good stuff Stone was saying in the media, that said, “I should have fired him sooner!”
Get Stone’s THE MAN WHO KILLED KENNEDY: THE CASE AGAINST JFK.
Oops. That’s ...THE CASE AGAINST LBJ.
I guess that means he’s sensationalizes and he’s not someone you find credible. okay got it. Wasted my time posting.
Huh?
Later
By “Huh?” I mean: I recommend a book, and you interpret that to mean I don’t think the author is credible?
I’m confused (as I frequently am). Are we talking about Roger Stone here or Oliver Stone?
You are correct he resigned. Having had two bestsellers and a dozen books, there is no such thing as a “book tour” for anyone who isn’t a bona fide #1 consistent best seller, and even then, 90% of a “tour” is radio call ins. So the “book tour” angle is not correct. He may SAY it, but it’s just not true.
I don’t know who you think Roger Stone is, but I know he does real book tours. I’ve heard him on radio shows, and he’s on C-SPAN and YouTube videos in bookstores. That’s how I first heard of the JFK book. He’s had several big sellers since then.
A VERY prominent conservative just did a "book tour" of three cities. Publishers for not do "book tours" unless you are Hillary, Carson, or, at her peak, Palin. The economist does not work. A relative unknown like Simon will get a package that gives him 50 radio call-in shows, maybe a booking on Alex Jones (where this was filmed) or Glenn Beck. But the notion that someone goes to 30 different towns does not happen except for the very biggest names.
Roger Stone. He’s a strong character, but he’s right, on our side, has been around the block, and does his homework.
His insights on Trump and Trump’s positions are fascinating (and reassuring). This interview is very well worth a listen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.