I'd hit it.
But only if I could sexualize it, objectify it, and dehumanize it.
Me too. Oh, wait...
She better not get too drunk in a frat house.
I actually thought for a few minutes before reading this... how can they justify this. I thought and thought and in the furthest recesses of my mind... even trying to think like a looneytoon, I could not, for the life of me, figure this one out.
I think the looneytoons, at this point, are just trying to outdo each other, with ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’ at each other until the next looneytoon reaches way back into his drug-fried brain and pulls out another PC gem.
Future welfare recipient.
“It’s a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’s idea originally, of course,” he added as an afterthought.” (1.5.23, Syme) Nineteen Eighty-four
I don’t think there is anyone on the Earth so oppressed as a college freshman in a humanities program in the United States of America. How do they survive it?
Well, since the black racists couldn’t get Ebonics in schools, they’ll just ban proper English instead. “It be a white thang!”
Another one for the cage.
one silly millimeter (to quote an old commercial)
I'd hit it.
But only if I could sexualize it, objectify it, and dehumanize it.
And for some women, there is no wrong way for them to cut their hair:
Reminds me of Chesterton:
“Suppose we heard an unknown man spoken of by many men. Suppose we were puzzled to hear that some men said he was too tall and some too short; some objected to his fatness, some lamented his leanness; some thought him too dark, and some too fair. One explanation (as has been already admitted) would be that he might be an odd shape. But there is another explanation. He might be the right shape.”
http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/orthodoxy/ch6.html
In my college years long ago, a freshman of either sex was seldom heard from, as they were too new, too wet behind the ears, to have any valid opinion that someone wanted to hear. I miss those years! The Internet has the responsibility of spawning such drivel because there is no editor, there is no fear of ridicule for expressing an insane opinion.
Too insane to be permitted to walk around among sane people.
“There is no proper way for a woman to cut her hair, let alone do anything right in this world.”
There used to be, but your precious feminists demanded we do away with all standards and decorum, so they could do as they please.
Now we see ladies aren’t really happy with that, and they long, even if it’s unconsciously, for what they’ve tossed aside.
Too few brains inside that pretty little head ...
Has she ever heard of a comb or brush?
I’m sorry, was that TOO mean?
The biggest reason why you should not send your kids to college right away if ever.
Too stupid to live.