[elhombrelibre]

Well, Trump needs to do the Democrats work; he has been one of their big funders for years. Why shouldn't he spout their claims to destroy his new found party?

[Quality_Not_Quantity]

In this way, Trump is like the DemocRats - he controls every conversation.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Again...? Didn’t we get tired of this like 5 or 6 threads ago!?

[MeshugeMikey]

“during his reign” the cornerstone faux pas..

if this guy is the alert... aware...smartest guy in the room he claims to be he would not have let “during his reign”..slip out.

now if he’s not.... such untoward statements should become ever more regular features of his campaign...

[SubMareener]

So you are denying that George W Bush was President on September 11, 2001?

[DoughtyOne]

But he isn’t spouting Truther claims, despite the inflammatory headlines.

You know that.

You’re just trying to smear him.

Who do you work for?

Normal FReepers don’t make false charges against the other candidates. They value the truth and try to stick to it.

[McGruff]

You definitely have a case of

[Catsrus]

Yet another lie from an anti-Trump. He has given far more to Republicans than Democrats. Why don’t you and other haters do your research before opening your mouth and spewing lies? There is a commandment: “thou shalt not bearm false witness against thy neighbor.”

[RoosterRedux]

National Review just doesn't get it.

Trump baited Jeb and Jeb fell into the trap.

Trump just handcuffed Jeb to George W.'s administration.

Looks like some on FR don't get it either.;-)

Eventually the GOP establishment and the slow learners on FR will all come round.

[Lib-Lickers 2]

the failed Republican(e) chimes in

[Jedidah]

Why on earth are you posting this?

This kind of reasoned commentary has no place at this time on Free Republic.

[TexasCajun]

You do realize Trump's 911 rhetoric is not aimed at GW, but at Yeb!

Here's what that loud-mouth Democrat Rush Limbaugh had to say:

Trump’s 9/11 Play Beats the Political Insiders at Their Own Game -- Brilliantly

[odawg]

“To the extent that such noises edge uncomfortably near to “trutherism,” that charmless fringe that believes the United States government was behind the bloodiest terrorist attack on American soil, they are shameful.”

Another lame, smear hit-piece from the a group of geldings over at National Review.

“Why shouldn’t he spout their claims to destroy his new found party?”

Who is more to toxic than the GOPe?

[Hugin]

What's far-fetched is casting Trump's factual statement as uncomfortably near to “trutherism,”.

Or your pathetic attempt to make an issue of Trump's donations to pols of both parties as a businessman.

[mkjessup]

Calling all Trump-haters! A public service announcement just for you.

[867V309]

Why shouldn't he spout their claims to destroy his new found party?

His new found party dug its own grave with the likes of The Boosches, McCane, turtle, boner, romney, cantor... oh Lord, please help me stop...

[tumblindice]

I fart in your general direction.

[GraceG]

Get them (fedgov) to release the 29 redacted pages of the 9/11 report first before laying into Trump.

[Will88]

All you’re doing here is making yourself look obsessive and silly. The same people at the same publications who’ve been trashing Trump since he announced, and putting the worst possible, twisted interpretation on everything he said past and present are still at it, still trying to damage his candidacy with distortions and misrepresentations.

They, and you, will have the same success, or lack thereof, as was realized in past attempts to trash the leading Republican candidate.

[MichaelCorleone]

All Donald Trump said was that GWB was Chief Executive at the time of the terrorist attack. Period.

Judging from the extreme defensive and emotionally-based reactions from the likes of NYT, WaPo, NatRev, RNC, ect., it’s obvious they all know Bush and Cheney and Rice eff’d up big time.

As Rush pointed out years ago, liberals always give themselves away.

[moehoward]

"Republicans have long said that George W. Bush “kept us safe,” and what they meant is obvious: He does not deserve much blame for the September 11 attacks, and does deserve some credit for the fact that they had no sequel."

Completely false. The WTC attack under Bush WAS the "sequel".