Posted on 10/13/2015 9:22:21 AM PDT by Isara
The irony and hypocrisy are dripping in this story, but what would you expect from the anti-American Democrat Party, which more closely resembles the Communist Party of Karl Marx than the former party of John F. Kennedy.
From the official Democrat Party Twitter account on Monday comes this snarky tweet, indicating that the party, which has a president whose birth certificate was produced under questionable circumstances, and continues to keep much of his past concealed, including for some reason his college records, which indicates the Democrat Party will go full birther when it suites their needs.
It also shows that the Democrat Party is threatened by constitutional conservative and presidential candidate Ted Cruz.
It was Democrat operative James Carville who admitted that “Ted Cruz is the most talented Republican politician” that he has “seen in 30 years…He ain’t squishy.” Famous liberal attorney and professor Alan Dershowitz, who taught Ted Cruz at Harvard, also referred to Cruz as “off the charts brilliant,” and said he was:
“One of the sharpest students I had . . . Ive had 10,000 students over my 50 years at Harvard . . . he has to qualify among the brightest of the students.”
Rather than focus on the un-American activity of their two-term elected Marxist president, the Democrat Party tweeted on Monday the following tweet bashing Texas Senator Ted Cruz, even though Cruz is clearly eligible to be president, according to the National Constitution Center.
We’re so excited for the #DemDebate that we almost forgot to wish a happy Canadian Thanksgiving to @tedcruz 🍁
The Democrats (@TheDemocrats) October 12, 2015
Democrats haven’t always been so favorable of birtherism, never giving a rip where Barack Obama was born, as long as he offered them something called “Hope and Change,” and tickled their ears with slogans like “Yes we can!”
But the Democrats have bigger problems on their hands than their newfound acceptance of birtherism, like DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s continued struggles with being unable and unwilling to explain the difference between a socialist and a Democrat, a question that even their useful idiot followers are befuddled by.
No one is worried about Ted Cruz’s loyalty to America or his adherence to the U.S. Constitution. The same thing cannot be said of the Democrat Party.
They are so pathetic they make me sick.
The DNC is trying to pick our candidate for us. My attitude is that when your opponent gives you advice, ignore it and do the opposite.
Ted Cruz should congratulate the ‘RATs on the Great October Socialist Revolution of 1917 (October 24th on the Julian calendar, November 7th on the Gregorian calendar).
No. I’m sorry, but no Dem strategist is laying awake at night worried about Ted. He is incredibly smart, and a great debater and cannot get above 8% in any poll. He is a great corps commander who needs to be correctly used as AG or USSC justice.
The unjustified personal attacks will begin shortly. For the coming campaign, the venom will be the worst ever. The stakes are big for the marxists. They don’t want to lose the control that they have held over this country since 2009.
Let’s revisit your feelings about Cruz’ chances of success come February-March. He’s just about everybody’s 2nd choice as the GOP nominee, which is a good place to be in POTUS primaries.
Problem is 2nd choices don’t win. Nobody polling this low has won in my lifetime.
They definitely fear Cruz and for good reason.
I think that Cruz has the exact poll position that he wants at this time.
Wow! The National Constitution Center? They sound very official and Constitutional. AND they are national too! I wonder what their Center looks like? Must be some very old buildings with lots of books and stuff. They must really know what they are talking about. I think I'll send them some money right now!
Right after I puke my lunch.
Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.
It is crystal clear that the Founding Fathers used the Natural Law definition of 'natural born Citizen' when they wrote Article II. By invoking "The Laws of Nature and Nature's God" the 56 signers of the Declaration incorporated a legal standard of freedom into the forms of government that would follow.
President John Quincy Adams, writing in 1839, looked back at the founding period and recognized the true meaning of the Declaration's reliance on the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." He observed that the American people's "charter was the Declaration of Independence. Their rights, the natural rights of mankind. Their government, such as should be instituted by the people, under the solemn mutual pledges of perpetual union, founded on the self-evident truth's proclaimed in the Declaration."
“He is incredibly smart, and a great debater and cannot get above 8% in any poll.”
############################
I’m a pragmatic and enthusiastic Trump supporter, but in a perfect world, I’d love to see Cruz win the election.
However, to counter your point:
1) It is still very early. Anything can happen.
2) He seems to be doing well at fundraising.
3) My perception is that he is steadily gaining ground - 8% is not a bad number for him at this point.
4) Perhaps the best sign is that the Left is *terrified* at the thought of a Cruz presidency.
Cruz is playing the long game, and it will serve him well.
They fear Trump because he has a certain appeal to the daytime/reality TV crowd that typically votes Democrat.
FoxNews poll has Sen Cruz at 10 percent: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/17/donald-trump-leads-gop-field-ben-carson-ted-cruz-c/
Great. He finally got to double digits in a poll.
Rumbles were heard about obuma when he went into Chicago politics, that's when he spent millions to hid his background...and the rumbles have never quit....
I'm sure that this is just another piece of garbage to cause Cruz problems, which I don't think is fair...
If they want to rumble about something there are things with Clinton Crime Family and Barney Sanders (commie) they should be rumbling about...not Cruz...
Ted does very well in fundraising, but he needs it. Through JUNE he spent over $5m according to FEC data. I figure by now he has spent well over $15---before he announced he was staffing every county in IA. That's not cheap. Compared to Trump---even if Cruz wasn't spending the money---it's still chump change.
Trump, meanwhile, despite being the richest campaign on either side, has spent virtually nothing.
Not sure there is much "ground being gained." He's gone from about 5-8, getting lower in some polls, hitting 10 in one single poll. But in state polls he's not doing nearly as well, and that's where the rubber meets the road.
John McLame was off the radar in 2007, and bounced back in 2008 to win the GOPe nomination. Hell, he was toting his own luggage through airports to get on commercial flights at one point.
“I am NOT voting for Cruz”
Why not? Do not like conservatives.
So you base your opinions on Constitutionality by the number of "rumbles" in the media?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.