“Mike Adams is the best.” (friend the campus homo movement ever had.)
For all his sophistry, he is merely protecting the movement of homo stuff on campus. His logic gives them a safe protected place to destroy out children and our very society. He even helpfully says he will report this person to the government if they try to advocate against a “pride” movement.
Sick sick sick.
I’d understand how the conflict of ethics here could lead Adams to decline to take the specific course of action proposed by the letter writer, because he does not want to invest himself in what he thinks is a losing stratagem. Fair enough.
But to threaten to be a back stabbing asshole (pardon my French) is beyond the pale. This is looking for brownie points from just what? His ego? The world?