I’d understand how the conflict of ethics here could lead Adams to decline to take the specific course of action proposed by the letter writer, because he does not want to invest himself in what he thinks is a losing stratagem. Fair enough.
But to threaten to be a back stabbing asshole (pardon my French) is beyond the pale. This is looking for brownie points from just what? His ego? The world?
But to threaten to be a back stabbing asshole (pardon my French) is beyond the pale. This is looking for brownie points from just what? His ego? The world?
How about his desire to be consistent in his ideologica perspective regarding the pernicious nature of censorship...?
Funny how people support suppression, when said suppression furthers said people’s worldview...