Posted on 09/10/2015 4:51:45 PM PDT by Isara
The specter of a nuclear-armed Islamic Republic of Iran is the single greatest threat facing our nation, and if President Barack Obama's catastrophic nuclear deal with the mullahs goes forward, there will be nothing to stop them from obtaining a nuclear bomb. Astonishingly, we do not even know how bad the deal is because the Administration has not released all of the information relating to side deals with Iran as they are obligated to do under the terms of Corker-Cardin, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act that Congress passed and the President signed into law.
Today I sent Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner a letter that lays out the legal authority they possess as leaders in both Houses of Congress to actually stop this deal.
If we believe what we say about this deal—that it is a profound threat to our national security, to the survival of our friend and ally the nation of Israel and potentially to the lives of millions of Americans—then we should act like it. No show votes that are destined to lose; instead, the leadership should exercise their legal authority to actually prevent more than $100 billion from going to the Ayatollah Khamenei.
The approach I recommend entails a three-step process, and McConnell and Boehner should seize this opportunity to demonstrate leadership and make it happen.
First, both leaders should formally declare that President Obama has not submitted the agreement to Congress as required by Corker-Cardin. The terms of Corker-Cardin are clear: The president may not suspend any sanctions against Iran until he submits the entire agreement to Congress and gives Congress an opportunity to review it. The president has failed to submit widely reported but undisclosed side deals between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency that bear directly on the inspections regime at issue in the Iran agreement. Therefore, the president has not submitted a complete agreement as Corker-Cardin requires, and the 60-day clock for congressional review did not begin to run. As a result, critically, federal law prohibits the Obama administration from lifting sanctions under the agreement.
Second, Leader McConnell should schedule a vote on a resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that, if the agreement had been introduced as a treaty, it would not be ratified. This will put senators on record and will make clear that there is insufficient support in the Senate for approving the agreement as a treaty.
Third, given President Obama’s regrettable history of lawlessness, it is reasonable to assume that he will simply ignore the law and declare that he is lifting sanctions under the agreement anyway. On that assumption, we should make clear to the CEOs of banks holding frozen Iranian funds that their misplaced reliance on the president’s lawlessness would not necessarily excuse them from the obligation to comply with existing federal sanctions laws. And if they release billions in funds to Khamenei, they risk billions in civil (and possibly even criminal) liability once President Obama leaves office. Having spent years advising major corporations in private practice, I can say that their general counsels will likely tell them their legal exposure is real, which could well result in the banks deciding not to release the funds to Iran, despite the president’s actions.
This three-pronged approach is the only course we can take to actually stop the release of more than $100 billion to the regime in Tehran, which is the world’s leading state-sponsor of terrorism and which will use these funds to attack America and our allies.
And to reiterate, it is possible to stop the president because federal law—the explicit terms of Corker-Cardin—says so.
The legal authorities are straightforward. Corker-Cardin says that the president “shall transmit” the agreement to Congress. That starts a period of congressional review. Importantly, however, Corker-Cardin expressly states that “prior to” the transmission of the agreement and “during the period for congressional review,” the president “may not waive, suspend, reduce, provide relief from, or otherwise limit the application of statutory sanctions with respect to Iran.”
The problem for the president is that he never submitted the agreement as that term is defined in Corker-Cardin. Under Corker-Cardin, the agreement that must be submitted to Congress expressly must include any “related” materials, including “side agreements,” and any “related agreements.” But we now know—by sheer fortuity no less—that the president did not submit at least two side agreements. Congress obviously cannot do its job of reviewing the President’s agreement without all of the relevant materials. Therefore, because the president has not transmitted the agreement as defined by Corker-Cardin, under federal law he “may not” suspend any sanctions.
All of this is entirely within the authority of Leader McConnell and Speaker Boehner. It is no secret that they and I have not always agreed (to put it mildly), but this is an opportunity for them to show bold leadership. And I will readily sing their praises; as I told the Capitol rally yesterday, with regards to leadership, if they will only do the right thing, “I come not to bury Caesar, but to praise him.”
I therefore urge McConnell and Boehner to rigorously enforce federal law and declare that the president has failed to submit the agreement to Congress. Accordingly, under binding statute, the frozen funds cannot be released to the Ayatollah Khamenei, a theocratic zealot who pledges “death to America.”
...and Brutus was an honorable man.
McCookoo won’t buy it. He is counting on a new president to do the dirty work of trying to rescind it. Lazy SOB. He has power he won’t use because is on Obama and Ried’s payroll.
Y’all laugh if you want but I think that if we fail to stop this, this will become one of those turning points in history, like the Black Plague at Kaffa, or Alaric sacking Rome, or Vesuvius in 79 or a Serbian in Saravejo. One of those few times we can trace the subsequent events to a specific act or event.
Oh look, a strongly worded letter.
Yes, and add to that Obama's decision to import tens of thousands of Syrian beginning October 1, and we have the potential of completely neutralizing the US and filling it with Islamic terrorists before the end of Obama's term.
Exactly what the hell is he supposed to do?
Come on. Spell it out. What actions should Senator Cruz do this very moment.
Out with it!
There is no we. The Congress does not have a mouse in its pocket. The House and Senate of the United States have gamed themselves into this corner and they need to own it. The Republicans not the Democrats are totally responsible for this horrendous treaty going into effect.
It is a specific plan of action. He can not stop it alone.
I agree. It must be stopped. I don’t understand why Congress doesn’t declare Corker dead, vote on the “deal” as a Treaty (requiring 2/3 vote). When Treaty vote fails, Congress will have standing to stop Executive Action at the court.
And I would add because the Iran “agreement” requires the US to provide military assistance if attacked how is the agreement not a treaty?
No wonder they don't want to take a vote for history.
He could start with explaining why he supported that Corker-Cardin fiasco to begin with.
He has explained it. The Corker-Cardin bill, which he opposed but voted for at the end, was the only speed bump that would at least slow down the passage of the agreement. If McConnell had actually done his job and required an up or down vote, then the Corker-Cardin bill would have never seen the light of day. But those are just “strong words” again.
Nothing is ever good enough for those who think that a magic wand exists that Cruz or other conservatives don’t just pick up and wave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.