Posted on 08/21/2015 6:27:53 AM PDT by MNDude
While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton first sent or received it.
The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.
In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.
"It's born classified," William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO).
"If a foreign minister just told the secretary of state something in confidence, by U.S. rules that is classified at the moment it's in U.S. channels and U.S. possession," he said in a telephone interview, adding that for the State Department to say otherwise was "blowing smoke."
Reuters' findings may add to questions that Clinton has been facing over her adherence to rules concerning sensitive government information. Spokesmen for Clinton declined to answer questions, but Clinton and her staff maintain she did not mishandle any information.
Reuters was unable to rule out the possibility that the State Department was now overclassifying the information in the emails, or applying the regulations in some other improper or unusual way.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
State now willfully obfuscating.
ACTION NOW--- All possible connections WRT these activites and donations to the buck-raking Clinton Foundation must be explored. The cunning Clintons are hiding plenty.....however, the smirking Sid Blumenthal's emails should sound numerous L/E alarms.
DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY AND COLLUSION TO DECEIVE-- In 2009, the Clintons duped the public, the Clinton Foundation's Board of Directors, and its wealthy donors by announcing Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time adviser to both Clintons, had been hired...... (wait for it) "to work at the Clinton Foundation on a project to promote Bill Clintons presidential legacy. "
(waiting for hysterical laughter to die down)
But Sid's secret emails show that, while on the foundation payroll, ostensibly "promoting Bill's legacy," Blumenthal fed back-channel, usually unreliable, intelligence reports on Libya to then-Secy of State Clinton.
Hillary sent Sid's reports on to senior State official without attribution......as if they were her analyses.
========================================
The NYT reports extensively on Blumenthal's secret emails to Hillary (emails she did not want revealed):
<><> the Clintons announced Blumenthal was hired @ $320,000 per year by the Clinton Foundation to "promote Bill's presidential legacy",
<><> at the same time Blumenthal was tight w/ American Bridge and Media Matters two Democratic groups aiding 2016 Clinton's effort,
<><> Blumenthal was also a paid advisor to businesses seeking Libyan contracts (compromising US ntl interests, by marketing his influence w/ pal Hillary at the State Dept);
<><> Clinton Foundation employee Blumenthal was secretly advising Secy of State Clinton about Libya @$320,000 per year.;
<><> at the same time, Sid also pocketed $200,000 a year from Clinton political ally David Brock's media operations
cont below
TAXPAYERS DEMAND A COMPLETE ACCOUNTING Hillary allowed these vultures (her insider coterie) to pig-out at the public trough-----as if it were their personal ATM.
QUESTIONS THAT DEMAND ANSWERS
Which Hillary aides controlled: (1) State Dept bank accounts, (2) checking accounts, (3) State Dept budget items to contractors, employees, advisors?
Were Blumenthal, Mills and Abedin signatories to State Dept banking and checking transactions?
Were all tax-paid electronic and digital devices in their possession returned upon exiting govt employ?
Are Blumenthal, Mills and Abedin still listed on the govt payroll (an old bureaucratic trick)?
=================================================
TAXPAYERS DEMAND AN ACCOUNTING OF ALL TAX-PAID REIMBURSEMENTS AND OTHER GOVT EMOLUMENTS
PAID TO BLUMENHAL, HUMA ABEDIN AND CHERYL MILLS :
<><> EXPENSE ACCOUNTS
<><> HOUSING ALLOWANCES
<><> CLOTHINNG ALLOWANCES
<><> TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS--AIR AND GROUND
<><> CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENTS
<><> ALL ELECTRONIC REIMBURSEMENTS
<><> OFFICE SUPPLIES
<><> WIRE-TRANSFERS
DO THIS NOW---CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
===============================================
IF HILLARY'S AIDES USED THE US MAILS TO SUBMIT
IMPROPER REIMBURSEMENTS---REPORT MAIL FRAUD HERE:
https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
Nothing will happen to Hillary. She will be elected and will pardon herself. Or Biden will be elected and will pardon her. Or this whole investigation will find she did nothing wrong.
Look at everything Obama has gotten away with.
Weren’t there billions unaccounted for in the State Department during Hillary’s admin?
Thanks for keeping up with this mess.
QUIZ: How do you make $6 billion dollars disappear from the State Dept?
HINT: Wall Street makes money disappear faster than a cream puff at a Weight Watcher weigh-in.
Then US senators Clinton and Corzine.
BGRND Sen Corzine was fresh out of the Goldman Sachs executive suite. Then onto MF Global a company he started that misplace $1.3 billion investor funds. MFG also retained Huma's client----Teneo Strategies---and employed board member Bill for $50,000 per month.
Goldman honchos gave Hillary big bucks....and invested in Chelsea' hubby's hedge fund.
Isn’t Corzine back in business with another fund? He should have gone to jail.
So now we're down to "IS" means....
The other zinger..Bubba didn't use email as Prez because of Security concerns....and that would have been on govt issued unit. Are you telling me she didn't know that??
So now, I'm betting he also had a "personal" server. In fact, didn't he email "the blue dress"?
Regardless...Hillary has been involved with emails for 25 years. She can't program but she knows what it can do.
Hillary’s awareness of vulnerability of confidential executive documents to the force of subpoena stems from her earliest days while serving the prosecution of Richard Nixon.
Doesn’t matter what the medium, any document in any form, no matter how well protected can come back to bite ones rump. That is the lesson she learned in the 70’s and reinforced during her husband’s time in the White House.
Her royal hipness deserves to go to jail, but won’t, because the ruling elite never pays a penalty for their crimes.
The documents would not be stamped “classified.” The stamp would specify which level of classification.
Well duh. Satellite intelligence doesn’t go out as unclassified and get upgraded later. Stuff like that goes super top-secret+ and gets downgraded through a rigorous process. Cuban missile crisis intel photos (beyond the few released 40 years ago that were just barely un-fuzzy enough to see anything) are just being released now, so that should show you how often this happens.
And the real scandal hasn’t really surfaced yet. What’s the real scandal? Foreign intelligence services reading her e-mails in real-time. When you’ve set up your own version of Hotmail, foreign countries hack that faster than you fix your kid’s bike.
She was a Senator for 15 years and was the wife of the president. Before that, she had worked the prosecution of Richard Nixon, which dealt with all kinds of classified, restricted, and Privacy Act information. Then in front of the press, she’s putting on the babe-in-the-woods routine before walking out in a huff. This is the fruitcake that people want to be president. She’d crash and burn trying to run the PTA in Hometown, USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.