Have at it. (The Online headline appears above - in the paper, it's "Fear That Debate Could Hurt G.O.P. in Women’s Eyes". SSDD.
Oh no! Whatever will we do!
Yes, their concern just gives me the warm fuzzies.
It’s always the nebulous “some say...” “some fear....”....
I say let’s find these “some” bastards and string them up.
Some fear, some say. Journalistic laziness and bias even in the headline.
I am skeered!LOL.The FOX debacle was a high tech lynching of Trump and the icing on the cake was when they asked I forget which one...”What is your Word from God..” on this...in a caustic and offensive tone. I have not listened to FOX for years and I think I was right on that. I did tune into the debate. But frankly I no longer see any difference in the uni-party or MSNBC and FOX. Hooray for guys like Trump and Cruz who are breaking away from the fold!
Freegard
LEX
I guess The Times called Rosie?
Didn’’t bother to read it, since the headline reads, to me, that it’ is a sexist liberal article.
The effort to twist Trump’s words and meaning, the effort to continually tie Republicans and conservatives to misogyny is so tiring and baseless. Disappointing that Fox would stoop to this, that Kelly wants to use this as means to trash Trump and Republicans is shocking. There is no upside to this, except vilification, which she deserves.
Something to remember - the NYT has NEVER practiced “objective” journalism, so don’t expect them to start now.
Women (who are far from the political monolith lefties imagine - see Hillary’s support as evidence) need to eat too. If the college population and the workforce population are majority women, they had better start worrying about economic issues instead of touchy feely ones. Perhaps one day large numbers of them will work out that illegal immigration and the welfare state will drive taxes up and wages down even more.
Jeb! “Mr. Male Hormone” could hurt the GOP if he is the candidate, certainly.
Thank you NYT. They’re right. It’s time to declare the war on women is lost. Born women. The left won their war on unborn women.
“in women’s eyes”
I presume they mean cis-women?
Defunding Planned Parenthood is about the most pro-women act anyone could do. Hey New York Times, how did that “war on women” theme work out for the Democrats in the 2014 elections?
I support Cruz. I do not support Trump.
That said, isn’t there something disingenuous when the hive says.
1. Trump is no Team Player. He’s likely to go Third Party. He’s a crazy loose cannon.
2. Trump is ruining the Republican Brand.
Trump is Trump. Everyone knows that.
But they really need better henchman than the current lot.
Someone at the Slimes slipped up and outed Rupert Murdoch as the Foreign Billionaire who has ordered his media outlets like Fox Leftist News to take out Trump . The organized smear campaign was very apparent on Thursday night with his paid Lib assassins Kelly and Wallace seeming to really enjoy doing his dirty work.
Apparently , Rupert did not like Trump and his wife staying friends with his ex wife and other things like stopping the massive amnesty bullet train planned for Congress this summer .No wonder , Murdoch's buddies Barry and Pres VJ were telling everyone to watch the Debate or as we called the Murdoch hit
Murdoch was caught doing the exact same thing in England but the Brits dragged his dangerous devious ass into court.
The NYT, always looking out for metrosexual conservatives.
Concern trolling from NYT.
Too late.
Twitter / Facebook showed people LOVED Megyn being cut down to size: and of those, most were womyn. They tingle for some bad-boy alpha.
And Obama is just too phony now. Everyone knows his international jet-set junkets are on other people's money...hey, that's MY money! /shocked face>