I asked him if he was comfortable having a gay man alone with a kid.
He told me that there is a difference between gays and pedophiles, so his answer is "yes."
I think this is the belief of all those who voted to allow gay leaders in the BSA.
The only people left in the BSA will be gays, and idiot parents. Membership is going to shrink about 90%.
What happens when a parent demands a non gay scout leader for their kid?
They need to change the name to GSA.
He told me that there is a difference between gays and pedophiles, so his answer is "yes."
What a fool. He needs to spend just a few minutes looking at the facts of how queer pedophiles groom and recruit young boys.
I don’t see any problems with the fox in the henhouse.
Are these the same dummies who hate the Catholic Church because of its scandals? I mean, talk about blind!
Deeply troubled? May end???
For being such nice people, Mormons sure love their perverts.
“Wahls also worried about what he called a “political necessity” built into the new policy—the decision to allow the roughly 70 percent of members in the US who are chartered through religious organizations to continue excluding gay adults from hiring.”
When they first accepted gays as members 2 years ago, they said that they wont allow gays as leaders in the scouts. Many of us knew better and said it was only a matter of time before they reversed themselves and would indeed allow gays in leadership positions. Sure enough, 2 years later here we are.
So dont be surprised when they no longer allow charters to exclude gays too.
I had a buddy in high school who’s wealthy father went a little off the deep end. All of a sudden he was having parties at their big house and all these gay men were there. I was 16 at the time. I can tell you without any reservation that gay men prey on young men. They cannot help themselves. They want to turn you their way. They cannot help themselves.
I literally met 100’s of gay men while I was in high school. They were all self-loathing and self-destructive.
Queer men are perverts when it comes to young men and boys.
The Queer Scouts have just voted to allow the mentally ill to run their organization at the lowest levels where these mentally ill people have the most control over young minds full of mush.
The BSA will be sued and sued and sued because of this. This is the end of their organization.
“there is a difference between gays and pedophiles”
No there isn’t!
Over 80% of homosexuals were molested as children.
The ONLY reason they want this access is to MOLEST YOUR SONS!
Shut it down. Although they will probably be invited back to public schools, any one in their right mind should just say NO WAY.
From what I hear, the vote was unanimous.
That is enough to know.
Burn, baby, burn
if you expose your child to pornography, knowingly or unknowingly, you can be charged with child abuse and/or molestation
if you allow your child to attend an event run and they get exposed to pornography or molested while on ‘outings’ ... you should also be charged with abuse and molestation and also willful endangerment of the child
if you want to protect your kid and avoid any possible charges, it’s best to remove them from the scouts.
A high school acquaintance is one of the leaders of the gay scout movement, and I am his facebook friend. It has offered me a front row seat in liberal goal post moving.
Two years ago, BSA allowed gay scouts. My friend - very upset. That’s right - it ‘didn’t go far enough’, and the BSA was still a phobic den of hatred.
Ok. Today’s decision to allow gay leaders. My friend - very upset. Again, not far enough - because a church or sponsoring organization for a troop can still reject gay leaders. BSA, despite their capitulation, (thank you Robert Gates), gets no ‘credit’ from liberals - still a phobic den of hatred.
When will he be happy? I assume if churches were forced to accept gay leaders, he would next be upset that none of the BSA senior leadership is gay, etc., etc. So he won’t ever be happy.
That’s liberalism.
And that’s a very good illustration of why GOP politicians should never, ever, try to ‘compromise’ with a liberal.
Guess what. Gays will flock to where the boys are. It’s what they do.
How liable are the churches who sponsor the Boy Scout troops? If a molestation or rape occurs who gets sued?
Oh the joy when they bugger a boy! Next step lowering or removing consent laws
By definition gays must be recruited. This is ripe plucking grounds to groom young boys.
I use to be in the scouts. It was manly back in my day. We shot rifles, bow and arrows, made squirrel traps, and even figured out how to summon the fire gods with string and sticks. I donated money and gave them camping gear to the local troop. BUT, never again. They are literally bending over for the gaystapo.
Liberals want the mere word "discrimination" to be a dirty word. Yet one more example of them laboring to control our daily language.
Know what? Sometimes discrimination is a very good thing.
I discriminate all the time by not giving my 3 year old a steak knife to play with.
Further, I directly discriminate in my hiring practice by not hiring the 9 year old neighbor kid to watch my 3 year old as that would likely be a dangerous situation. Therefore, I discriminate in my hiring practice and refuse to hire that kid.
In a similar manner, discrimination in this case is abundantly reasonable in not wanting to put a male homosexual in the same weekend tent with a 12 year old boy. The empirical data proves that homosexual men have many, many sexual encounters.
By a show of hands, how many parents would eagerly discriminate by refusing to allow their 11 or 12 year old daughter to go out on a weekend camping trip with a male or a couple of male Girl Scout leaders?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3023834/posts - The Gay Manifesto thread...