To: Dr. Sivana
How much territory would need to be covered by solar facilities if Vermont actually did get 75% of its energy from that?
Of course solar towers burn birds and wind chops them up, but who’s keeping score.
14 posted on
07/25/2015 4:04:25 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
How much territory would need to be covered by solar facilities if Vermont actually did get 75% of its energy from that?
In winter, the whole state could be one giant solar panel, and it wouldn't be enough.
17 posted on
07/25/2015 4:06:49 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: HiTech RedNeck
We already get nearly that amount from renewables, it’s called Hydroelectric and it has powered most of this state since Rural Electrification.
42 posted on
07/25/2015 5:43:38 PM PDT by
VTenigma
(The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Vermont is far enough north that solar is a stupid idea, unless they can make it two or three times more efficient
48 posted on
07/25/2015 6:07:35 PM PDT by
GeronL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson