Posted on 07/21/2015 7:01:52 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
Why would this country elect as president some guy who was known to regale friends with nigger* jokes, had a history of depression, was suicidal from time to time and eventually started an internecine war that took over 600,000 lives and... What? Oh, yeah. THAT WAS LINCOLN! never mind! * A corruption of the word referring to the area near the NIGER River in Africa and now freely used by blacks around the world when referring to one another. To NOT have written the word here would be to accord the dark forces of political correctness an inappropriate and destructive victory of which Orwell's Thought Police would be proud.
Why would we elect president some guy who was not healthy and smoked 3 packs of cigarettes a day, married his fifth cousin then had a notorious affair with his secretary and... What? Oh, sorry, THAT WAS FDR!
How in the WORLD could we elect to the presidency some guy who was a 60s socialist radical, later married one even more radical than himself, wangled multiple deferments from MILITARY SERVICE while other kids his age were humping through the bush in Vietnam dodging bullets and who was a woman abuser and engaged in sexual misconduct in the Oval Office with a young intern then, under oath, perjured himself about it and... What? Oh, right, THAT WAS BILL CLINTON! never mind!
But why the heck would we elect some guy raised by grandparents and some pornographer -- all three of whom were on FBI "Communist Watch" lists in the 50s and 60s (back when the FBI actually did its job of trying to protect US) – and whose mother posed nude for the pornographer before abandoning him and who has openly admitted to have been – and probably still is – a pot head and user of harder illegal substances and whose every action bespeaks a hatred for the nation he allegedly heads... What? Oh, right. THAT WAS BARACK OBAMA! never mind!
I haven't researched all the other folks we elevated to the highest elected office in this country. If I did, I'm sure I'd find warts and blemishes on ALL of them. And why would that be? BECAUSE, LIKE YOU AND ME, THEY'RE ALL IMPERFECT HUMAN BEINGS AND ALL FALL SHORT OF THE GLORY.
Until some leftist “journalist” comes up with a fully documented list of things he has said or done to convince me that he is attempting to prevaricate his way into the presidency (as the last guy did!) or that his profession of LOVE for America is also a lie, MY MONEY'S ON DONALD TRUMP.
But my support for The Donald is based more on how the current crop (or is that crAp) of political elites and their media lapdogs and handmaidens are GOING NUTS because he is articulating problems in terms WE USE IN OUR CONVERSATIONS OUT HERE IN “FLYOVER COUNTRY”, AND NOT TALKING ABOUT HOW BEST TO ARRANGE THE DECK CHAIRS ON THE FOUNDERING SHIP CALLED “AMERICA”.
Because the entrenched forces he faces have a 3 way program for dealing with outsiders (1. IGNORE; 2. DISCREDIT; 3. ELIMINATE), all we have to do is pray he REMAINS ALIVE through the debates, the election and, hopefully, on to January 20th, 2017 and an inauguration.
PS: And if you're hung up on the McCain-Trump dustup, an old, dear friend who retired as a naval carrier aviator and also served in Vietnam recently sent me this email. If you'll investigate, you'll find that MANY vets – including yours truly – feel as Frank does.
"Dick, Please stay on top of this story. Nothing would please me more than to see that scumbag McCain is brought down, and brought down hard! Now that his "honorable POW" status has been challenged, I hope they carry the rest of it through and thoroughly discredit him. I have long felt that he was the modern day "Manchurian Candidate," and that the North Vietnamese have evidence of collaboration that would destroy him were it to be publicized. He is, IOW, being blackmailed into acting and voting as he does in the Senate. Frank"
Nicely done.
So you’re going to prop the product of Clinton Inc?
Ross Perot was there for Bill in order to defeat Bush.
Hillary Clinton will have Donald Trump. A huge distraction piece that has donated to the Clintons and the DNC.
So I’m withholding my support for Trump in hopes that Scott Walker isn’t doing his bid for a leap in speaking bits or a book deal.
Perot didn’t defeat Bush.
Bush defeated Bush.
DING DING DING—We have a winner!
Mssr. Bachert, for your consideration.
Slaves coming to market from “The Dark Continent” were termed “Negroes”. (We can determine the source of “Darkie” at a later date).
The Creole word is pronounced ^loosely^ “Neg-Rah” or “Neeg-rah” which became “Neegraz” (easier on the palate, in the plural).
This, throughout the South then became “Niggraz”
And, post-CWI we have “Niggaz” and “Niggers”
It is a simple degeneration of the American language and word.
HOWEVER
I am 100% for Trump as a spokesperson.
Then I predict you'll lose it.
Bump.
I think you have been a bit unfair to Lincoln. I believe his depression resulted from the untimely death of his son. Also, he hardly started a war. Any president in office at the time of the seccesion would have moved to prevent it.
Walker
Cruz
Jindal
Carly Fiorina
Marco Rubio
"Niger" is Latin for "black" or "dark," it's not even a term from an African language. Acts 13:1 refers to a Simeon whose nickname, or "street name" in common parlance, was Niger: maybe he was a black man, maybe his skin was darker than most, but it evidently wasn't meant as a slur, any more than all the other "street names" in the NT, such as "Barnabas" or "Barsabbas" or for that matter Peter.
Fiorina and Rubio are not conservatives.
I envision Trump being head of the department of commerce or trade commission.
....Under Walker/Cruz.
In a conservative purity test, they would score lower than most of the other candidates ...
If they are not conservative, what are they?
Ask any libtard and they will tell you they are foaming at mouth rabid conservatives...
Hillary! will only have Trump as a foil if Trump runs third party.
But she WILL win if Trump runs as a third party.
Moderate Reps one step away from being RINOs.
Cruz is my next choice if Trump suddenly dies (suicided) or self destructs. Then Carly just to draw the female vote away from Hitlery.
Walker
Cruz
Jindal
Carly Fiorina
Marco Rubio
There have been posts questioning the conservative credentials of each of those candidates. Fewest for Cruz, but some consider him an establishment guy in conservative clothing. And Rubio fails the immigration test, according to others. Who’s right? Who’s wrong? Getting confusing out there!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.