Posted on 07/18/2015 2:45:16 PM PDT by Kaslin
Sweet Cakes by Melissa owners Aaron and Melissa Klein had the audacity to defend their religious beliefs two years ago, and they suffered mightily. When a lesbian couple, Laurel and Rachel Bowman-Cryer, requested a cake from the Oregon-based Christian bakers for their wedding, the latter politely declined because doing so would violate the religious edicts they so strongly follow. The Kleins’ religiously motivated decision prompted the gay couple to sue, and the Oregon labor commissioner ruled that the Kleins would have to shell out $135,000 in damages. Thanks to Americans who still cherish religious freedom, however, it appears this Christian family will be more than able to pay that bill.
The Kleins had a fundraising page set up on the crowdfunding website GoFundMe. After pressure from gay marriage activists, site administrators decided to remove the page. Here’s how GoFundMe got away with that after their initial explanation about restricting crowdfunding pages for companies faced with "formal charges in defense of heinous crimes" didn't fly (the Kleins were not charged with a crime):
A few days later, GoFundMe changed the policy to include a ban on “claims of heinous crimes, violent, hateful, sexual or discriminatory acts,” making it easier to remove campaigns for Christian-owned business owners fighting discrimination charges after declining to provide services for gay weddings.
Despite being booted from the website, the Christian bakers still managed to rake in and keep about $109,000 from the fund.
Their campaign was picked up by another crowdfunding site, Continue to Give, and it has lived up to its name. As of today, the campaign has reached about 250 percent of its goal. Here are the astounding figures:
A crowdfunding campaign for the Oregon bakery Sweet Cakes by Melissa has set a site record by raising $352,500 in about two months after being kicked off the GoFundMe website, far exceeding the initial goal of $150,000.
That, reports the Washington Times, is a new crowdfunding record for the website.
A similar scene was played out earlier this year in a small pizza shop in Walkerton, Indiana. After Gov. Mike Pence (R-IN) signed the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act into law, which protects business owners from the government infringing on their religious beliefs, tensions were already high throughout the state. The owners of Memories Pizza became unwanted martyrs in the fight. After telling local news reporters they supported RFRA and could not cater gay weddings because their faith would not allow it, the O’Connors received hate mail - even a death threat - and were forced to close up shop.
In response to the bitter backlash, The Blaze’s Dana Loesch announced she was starting a GoFundMe page for the O’Connors and the response was immediate. The embattled pizza shop owners raked in $35,000 in just four hours (and it seemed the page was permitted to stay active.) Once again, Christian business owners stood up to the backlash - and won.
Both of these instances have proven that lawsuits and threats only make unapologetic Christian businesses stronger.
Now that the Kleins have reached their fundraising goals – and then some – it goes to show that a sizable number of Americans still err on the side of religious liberty.
As for those who are trying to remove the Klein’s crowdfunding page from Continue to Give, founder Jesse Wellhoefer has a simple message:
“Lots of people have been asking us to take it off,” Mr. Wellhoefer said. “Our response has been, ‘Thank you for your concern, have a great day and God bless you.’”
but thee whining lesbians were offended all the the way to the bank, right?
“Lots of people have been asking us to take it off,” Mr. Wellhoefer said. “Our response has been, ‘Thank you for your concern, have a great day and God bless you.’”
Rightious.
Stay strong, Mr. Wellhoefer!
How can a “labor commissioner” impose a fine? Can’t that only be done by a judge? Where was “due process” in this case.
Also, is the “labor commissioner” a poof?
They haven't gotten a nickle yet.
I don’t like how this bakery and its owners has been castigated by the media and treated for their faith, but I also don’t like the idea of a bakery owned by Christians who interpret Matthew 5:32 as saying that you can only divorce and remarry if your spouse has committed adultery refusing service to other Christians whom they think are remarrying and thin their remarriage to be an adulterous one. Millions of Christians have divorced and remarried and I doubt that all of them interpret Matthew 5:32 this way.
And I certainly don’t like the idea of any Muslim who owns a business in a heavily concentrated area of Detroit or other city refusing business to other Muslims who don’t have beards.
Nor do I like the idea that Muslim cab drivers, some of whom said that they should not be forced to give rides to people who drink and being able to refuse service to people who do drink alcohol based upon religious belief -— as an attempt by some Muslims to refuse service on these grounds was attempted a little while back.
Aren't all white male liberals poofs?
oh...good!
The baker probably wouldn’t know if adultery is involved, unless the couple told them.
But with queers it is quite obvious what is going on.
They ought to be free to only supply a product which contains an expression of approval or blessing or celebration to whomever their consciences deem they may supply said product without committing sin. And if that is stricter than the Lord intended, still the Lord would not want their conscience gratuitously violated, that is without genuinely being persuaded.
Poof it.
The liberals are furious... whining that it ia not fair ...
I believe that the first Amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise there of"
I don't see anywhere it says, "You shall bake a cake for anyone, any time and for any reason".
All the queers had to do was to move on to a bakery that would accommodate their perverted desires...piece of cake.
In small towns you can bet they would know.
And in large towns you can bet they won’t.
Do you enjoy using Straw Man arguments by saying that I “enjoy forcing people to provide services that are against their religious beliefs?”
Looking at the picture of the bulldykes, the bakery owners did them a favor by refusing to make them a cake!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.