Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican presidential candidate unloads on Fox News during Fox News interview
Business Insider ^ | Friday, July 10th, 2015 | Colin Campbell

Posted on 07/11/2015 3:47:55 AM PDT by stevie_d_64

Presidential candidate and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) is furious about Fox News' rules for the first GOP primary debate.

In a Fox News interview on Friday, Graham blasted the right-leaning network's "dumb" rules, which will limit the participants to 10 candidates polling the best in an average of the five most recent national polls.

"I think that this is a dumb way to weed out the field," Graham declared.

Many critics say the August 6 debate's rules harm the candidates campaigning in the early voting states and elevate those who have been getting those most national TV exposure or who have run for president before.

With around 17 Republican candidates running, there will be a number of furious White House hopefuls left out of the crucial opportunity to be heard before a major television audience. Graham, who is lagging in national polls, clearly agrees with that assessment. He argued that July 2015 is too early to even pay attention to polls.

"Brad Pitt would be in the debate in August. Anybody with any celebrity would be in the debate," he said. "I don't mind weeding out the field over time."

"It's July for God's sakes!" he added. "So a national poll is a lousy way, in my view, to determine who should be on the stage. And I quite frankly resent it."

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: complainingrino; debates; foxnews; lindseygraham; loserrino; primaries; whiningrino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: stevie_d_64
FNC's "dumb" rules may change after they see who's on top and who is not.

-PJ

61 posted on 07/11/2015 6:29:03 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Even with 10 participants, they will be lucky to get 4-6 minutes of answer time in a 90-minute debate.

Give each a 2 minute opening and closing statement, and you already have eaten up 40 minutes.

Allow for mods to ask their editorizing questions could add up to 20 secords or more per question.

Give candidate(s) 2 minutes to respond.

Add on time for a candidate named in another candidate’s answer to repond — 1 minute.

Typically, in the past, the mods have asked more questions of the perceived frontrunners.

==


62 posted on 07/11/2015 6:40:32 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
Somehow trump will be excluded because he would embarrass them all

I'm sure the moderator will avoid all questions that could give Trump an edge...Trump will have to be pretty sharp to weave his way back to the important issues as the moderator fields insignificant questions to him...

63 posted on 07/11/2015 6:53:14 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

“I hate to say it, but Limpy Graham is right...”

He absolutely is.

This plan is designed to reward wealthy or establishment candidates and prevent a grassroots campaign from being able to form. They have to scrap it and start over.


64 posted on 07/11/2015 6:53:56 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Why would someone with no chance run for president? $800,000. Candidates for federal office can draw a salary from campaign funds equal to the salary of the office they are seeking.

That’s why Sharpton and the rest of the clown squad runs. That 800 thousand dollar payday if you run for 1 year and one day.


65 posted on 07/11/2015 7:04:50 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

This whole election cycle, actually the last couple remind me of an old Steppenwolf song

“The people grew fat and got lazy now their vote is a meaningless joke”


66 posted on 07/11/2015 7:07:18 AM PDT by DaiHuy (May God save the country, for it is evident the people will not! Millard Fillmore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

This South Carolinian would’t vote for that maroon if he gave me tickets to the Clemson v. Notre Dame game.


67 posted on 07/11/2015 7:08:03 AM PDT by AmericanRobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

It would be tough to imagine that a field of ten would not include Cruz, Walker, Trump, etc. To this day I think the strongest farm team the GOP had was in 1980, but those days are gone. It will be interesting to see if Perry makes it among the ten.


68 posted on 07/11/2015 7:15:15 AM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

RCP latest average of four polls would have Perry included.

I have not heard if the GOP will definitely use the RCP lists, but it should be close.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html


69 posted on 07/11/2015 7:23:31 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

In short ... agreed.


70 posted on 07/11/2015 7:34:05 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

if the only choices were Clinton or Graham., I would take Graham...I am not crazy about Graham either, but at least I would not be condemned to Hell by a Holy God


71 posted on 07/11/2015 7:37:02 AM PDT by Chauncey Uppercrust (BLUE LIVES MATTER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Lyndsey Graham. Such a bitch.


72 posted on 07/11/2015 8:05:55 AM PDT by submarinerswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

“Let’s be honest....other than 10,000 votes out of South Carolina....no one else would vote for the guy. If you gave me a choice of Hillary or Graham....I’d actually vote for Hillary.”

I don’t like Lindsay, but he is not a corrupt, criminal sociopath like Hillary. Lindsay would continue to let the country slip left and Hillary would take us over the cliff to a form of Marxist dictatorship.


73 posted on 07/11/2015 8:13:41 AM PDT by Pirate Ragnar (Libs put feelings first and thought second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I'm for the 'Wheel of Fortune' method. Moderator asks the question FIRST then Meghan Kelly spins the wheel maybe 5 times per question.
74 posted on 07/11/2015 10:00:54 AM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
In a Fox News interview on Friday, Graham blasted the right-leaning network's "dumb" rules, which will limit the participants to 10 candidates polling the best in an average of the five most recent national polls.

"I think that this is a dumb way to weed out the field," Graham declared.

I guess for the sheer entertainment value alone, Lindsay ought to be in the debate.

75 posted on 07/11/2015 10:03:51 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

Maybe a drinking game? A shot or beer chugged for every country Linda mentions we need to invade?

The field does get weeded out. They are called primaries.


76 posted on 07/11/2015 10:10:35 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

A simpering fag from SC
Thought that Fox should put him on TV
Though he whimpered and cried
(With McCain by his side)
The event will still be Goober-free

Hank


77 posted on 07/11/2015 10:11:21 AM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball (Eat Hooterville Rutabagas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

The whole idea of making the primary Jeb vs Trump and leaving out real conservatives is what should outrage people


78 posted on 07/11/2015 10:15:01 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The whole problem with that scenario is that people would be evaluated based on their ability to give a two-minute speech rather than their ability to govern.

It might be controversial to say this but television has done a great disservice to the democratic process, in my opinion.

79 posted on 07/11/2015 11:26:53 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

If Lindseed was in the top ten meaning a candidate who anybody gave a hoot about he would be staying quiet.


80 posted on 07/11/2015 11:39:58 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson