Posted on 06/28/2015 12:04:45 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Congressional Republicans say they are ready to welcome Pope Francis to Capitol Hill this fall — even if he uses part of his speech to challenge them on issues like climate change or income inequality.
Francis’s climate change encyclical last week was just the latest example of his willingness to wade into contentious political debates, often with positions that seem to fall on the liberal side of the spectrum.
“I think all of us respect [Francis] for his religious station and his religiosity,” said Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), who is a vocal critic of the Obama administration’s climate change policies.
“I don’t think that transfers over to a complicated secular scientific question like we’re dealing with here. I think we’re going to look more to the people who have spent their lifetimes studying these things, both pro and con, more so than any religious leader.”
Francis is set to address Congress in September, presenting him with an enticing opportunity to press his case to lawmakers on a host of hot-button issues.
The pope’s critique of capitalism has already earned him scorn from the right. After a 2013 apostolic exhortation, Rush Limbaugh called the pope a “Marxist.”
Francis ventured into another charged debate this week by labeling gun manufacturers as unchristian. The Vatican also recognized the state of Palestine, an affront to American foreign policy in the Middle East.
Depending on the content of his speech, the pope’s address to Congress could create some uncomfortable moments for Republicans and Democrats alike, particularly if applause starts to break down on partisan lines.
No matter what subject he chooses, lawmakers say the pope probably won’t change many minds in the chamber.
“There will be a lot people wanting him, ‘Oh, this will be his opportunity to come and lecture the Republicans on climate change,’ and probably some our side will say, ‘Oh, this will be his opportunity to come and lecture the Democrats on abortion,’” Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said. “My guess is he’ll strike some different balance than that.”
Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.) said Democrats have been selective in what they take from the pope’s encyclical, leaving out the anti-abortion message Francis built into his defense of nature.
“What I have requested is that when the pope does come, he focus on those things that are infallible and are not politically-based or based on basic human concerns,” Huelskamp, a Catholic, said.
A week after the pope released his climate change call-to-action, the reaction in Washington has amounted to a one-way spin war waged by Democrats and activists.
Obama administration officials from the head of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Surgeon General have lauded the encyclical, and Democrats still hope the popular pope will move the needle on the environment.
But Republicans have shrugged it off as, at best, a powerful moral document that will nevertheless have little bearing on the climate debate in the United States.
“Do I think it’s going to change basic partisan alignments and attitudes? Probably not,” Cole said of the speech. “But do I think he is wise enough and astute enough to find some context in which what he has to say will have some impact? Yes I do.”
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who is Catholic and invited Francis to address Congress, said he respects the pope’s “right to speak out” on climate change, but demurred on whether the encyclical would spur any action in the GOP-controlled Congress.
“There's a lot of bills out there,” Boehner said. “I'm not sure where in the process these bills may be.”
Other Republicans said they are curious to hear what message the pope brings to Congress as they battle to stop Obama’s climate change regulations.
“I know the question is, ‘Will he bring this up when he comes to speak to us in September,’ so it will be interesting to look forward to,” Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) said after a press conference about a bill repealing an EPA power plant regulation.
“We need to do everything we can to protect the environment, certainly, but at the same time, we have to protect Americans, we have to make sure that they are receiving affordable energy sources, and not moving forward with power grabs such as this EPA regulation.”
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a Catholic and presidential candidate, told Florida reporters last week that Francis is a “moral authority and as a moral authority, is reminding us of our obligation to be good caretakers of the planet.”
But at the same time, “I’m a political leader and my job as a policymaker is to act in the common good,” he said. “And I do believe it’s in the common good to protect our environment, but I also believe it’s in the common good to protect our economy. There are people all over this planet and in this country who have emerged from poverty in large respect because of the availability of affordable energy.”
Other Republicans are excited for the September speech and eager to see the pope in person.
Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said, “We always welcome the pope when he comes to this country and we’re looking forward to hearing from him.” Cole said Francis has “created a problem for every politician in America” because of the high demand for guest tickets to the speech.
Some Catholic Republicans said the presence of lawmakers might actually take something away from Francis’s message.
“I think he’s an important figure in the world, and so, certainly for Catholics, people will want to understand his viewpoints and will certainly listen very carefully to his viewpoints,” Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) said. “He’s our religious leader, and so I think he will offer a very important perspective. He’s certainly an opinion-maker on issues.”
“I don’t think we should politicize an encyclical from His Holiness,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said. “I think we should learn from it and have it influence our policy, but also influence our dialog. … I think we’re all talking about it, so by definition, it has.”
Go home, you freaking hippy...
Interesting times we live in!
By article of faith He ought to be by definition.
But as can be seen in real time, he needn’t be.
Part of the international left’s efforts, to keep Catholics voting democrat.
“Is the Pope a wise leader?” “ Is the Pope an honest person?” or even “Is the Pope a pollitical imbecile?” These have never been rhetorical.
To paraphrase a line from Fiddler on the Roof- “May God bless and keep the Pope— far, far away from us.”
More seriously, I’ve read a good portion of the encyclical but not all. The actual moral statements seem to consist of vague platitudes recarding being good stewards which no one should have a problem with. There is some concerning imagery which he lifted from St. Francis, but that part is used as a poetical intro to the encyclical.
The problems arise when he starts repeating bad science info given to him by advisors with an agenda (which include that silly word consensus-a word completely inappropriate inside the realm of science). Also the possible solutions he gives, simply gives ammo to people who would institute policies antithetical to the Faith.
As a faithful Catholic i respectfully am reading the encyclical. So far I am taking away that I should be a good steward. I can also see where the Pope appears to have repeated some political claptrap which he has bought into.
No statements appear which change the teaching of the Faith. And there are some pointed references to what we can not do to protect our environment which reaffirms what the Church has always taught. While reading it I often get the sense that I’m reading a cut and paste from at least two different authors.
We do not (Thanks be to God!) rely on the quality of our Church leaders for the salvation of our souls. Sometimes instead of inspiration, they can be a challenge to share in the carrying of the cross. We just have to respect the dignity and PROPER authority due the office and not fall into clericalism.
The Pope’s carbon footprint is too large. Flying thousands of miles to preach about alleged global warming.
Why doesn’t he use the internet to broadcast his speech?
Hypocrite.
Pope’s activism sets stage for awkward visit to Capitol Hill
AND Obama must do 10 “HAIL MARX”S” and “20 Our Fatherland’s”.. in penance for being non Catholic..
and cross himself three times before he gets a meal from the pope’s jugular..
The speech should be cancelled. The encyclical proved this Pope’s intellectual dishonesty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
While he is performing exorcism on both houses of congress, could he do a quickie of the white house as well? Is anybody checking into it......................?
If not personally, how about a SWAT team of cardinals..................
You could perhaps explain what you mean by that?
By affirming the reality of global warming, the Pope simultaneously did several things:
1) He showed himself to be the dupe of a hoax.
2) By promoting a hoax, he abuses his office, because the publication of this falsehood necessarily leads many—and the hoaxers will exploit this—to think that the global warming hoax is now supported by the teaching authority of the Catholic Church.
3) The encyclical is full of economic delusions, also put before the world as though supported by the teaching authority of the Papacy and the Church.
The Pope’s speech before the Congress should be cancelled for the simple reason that he is an intellectually disreputable person who abuses the authority of the office he holds. His speech before the Congress will constitute further abuse of his offic.e
It had appeared that you were referring to his failure to mention his debt to Gaia theory, ex-priest Leonardo Boff, and liberation theory in general (although Teilhard did come in for a cameo appearance in a footnote).
The encyclical provides proof of what all sentient people already suspected: Bergoglio’s mind is a chaotic garbage heap, in which cause-and-effect runs in both directions—or several directions at once. Not caring enough about the poor causes global warming, and global warming hurts the poor, and air-conditioning causes poverty, and poverty causes air-conditioning, etc. And Teilhard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.