Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

And in another article he (and colleagues) explained that “the very motivation for seeking an ‘origin’ of homosexuality reveals homophobia.”

Homophobia DOES NOT EXIST.

I am not afraid of homosexuals any more than I'm afraid of people with other mental illnesses.

I am very much afraid of the homosexual agenda that is simply a tool of the left and doesn't care about homosexuals any more than feminism cares about women or Planned Parenthood cares about parents.

1 posted on 06/19/2015 8:10:34 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 06/19/2015 8:11:11 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Bioethicist = criminals with science degrees.


3 posted on 06/19/2015 8:12:26 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I wonder if this will change how the nanny state thinks about steroids?

Probably not. Because for the most part, that involves men becoming...more like...men.


4 posted on 06/19/2015 8:19:40 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Roger that. Homosexuality is a choice. They like to claim their preference is immutable, like race, but if that were the case, there would be zero former homosexuals. There are zero former black folks, but there thousands of former homosexuals. See Anne Heche and NYC Mayor De Blasio’s wife, for instance.

I’ve heard Obama refuses to meet with reps of former homosexual organizations. Because obviously if they exist, then homosexuality is a choice, and that constituency he loves so much denies that fact, ergo, he refuses to meet with them. How can he meet with a group that doesn’t exist? Yep, they’re that crazy.


6 posted on 06/19/2015 9:19:05 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"A conservative is someone who stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it."

William F. Buckley, defining the mission of National Review in its first issue.

You cannot stop something without first slowing it down.

Staying home is not an option. Stopping Hillary and every other Democrat is necessary.

We have gone from the idea of critical medical treatment being a "right", to broad based, non-critical health care coverage being a "right", to elective genital amputation (a.k.a., gender reassignment surgery), being a "right".

We have gone from parenthood being a "right", with the pushing aside of cultural and legal restrictions around single women having children out of wedlock, single women adopting, and gay adoption, to now treating homosexuality as an infertility problem, and mandating insurance pay for fertility treatments and surrogacy for homosexuals.

It is only a matter of time it will be a "right" for homosexuals to have children of only their genome, via genetically modified Frankenchildren or clones.

All of us will have to pay more for our health insurance so as to provide these services for others. At the same time, to control costs, insurance companies will not provide such genetic treatments for heterosexuals, even if they have grave genetic issues such as carrying congenital illnesses.

And expect serious side effects of these genetically modified children, similar to the effects of inbreeding.

10 posted on 06/19/2015 9:36:06 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Another development could be “male pregnancies”. Now that it is possible to transplant a uterus, why couldn’t males bear children?

Cure cancer? Nah... Clearly, figuring out how to let men have babies is where our research dollars are needed.

11 posted on 06/19/2015 9:40:21 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The two biggest issues for licensed medical workers are 1) Identifying trans-people as their actual sex in medical records, and 2) Prescribing (or not) estradiol or testosterone for trans-people on request.

You can bet that licenses are going to be revoked over this in the next two-three years.

13 posted on 06/19/2015 10:25:57 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Wait, how can they have gender selection in unborn babies? We all know there is no such thing as gender, it’s a choice.


18 posted on 06/19/2015 11:03:33 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Can’t change the fact that God did not intend the anal canal for sex, thus causing disease when it is so used.


19 posted on 06/19/2015 8:47:05 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
About 20 years ago the bioethicist who is now the editor of the leading journal Bioethics, Udo Schuklenk and another author, argued in the Journal of Homosexuality that research into the origins of homosexuality was unethical in the present climate. “Research into the causes of homosexuality assumes more often than not that homosexuality is one or another form of mental illness or undesirable deviance from the heterosexual norm, and should be cured.” And in another article he (and colleagues) explained that “the very motivation for seeking an ‘origin’ of homosexuality reveals homophobia.”

They are afraid that research into the causes of homosexuality will result in hetero parents taking steps to prevent having a homosexual child.

There will not be research (at least not in the US) on creating a prenatal test for whether the fetus will be likely to develop into a homosexual. The gay lobby will proclaim such research a hate crime. They will also make it illegal for such a test to be administered, or used as a basis for deciding to abort.

22 posted on 06/20/2015 4:54:52 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I love this quote from Jurassic Park: “...your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should.”


31 posted on 06/20/2015 4:44:52 PM PDT by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How LGBT-friendly laws could change medicine

Boil it down?: Triple the Cost

Forcing insurers to throw disease-ridden whackjobs and their self-inflicted, expensive and unnecessary claims in the same pool with otherwise healthy, normal Americans will double or triple premiums.

(Community rating, Guaranteed Issue)

How is that fair?

33 posted on 06/21/2015 6:42:55 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson