Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California on Cusp of Fracking Boom Bigger than North Dakota
breitbart.com ^ | 6/17/2015 | Chriss W. Street

Posted on 06/17/2015 8:04:01 AM PDT by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: rktman

The sea levels will rise very soon and they won’t be able to drill in open waters.


21 posted on 06/17/2015 8:32:13 AM PDT by umgud (When under attack, victims want 2 things; God & a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“California on Cusp of Fracking Boom Bigger than North Dakota”

Not as long as the democRATS run the state.


22 posted on 06/17/2015 8:35:00 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Holy moley. They mentioned govt scientists so that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. I mean, how wrong could THEY be? A little disturbing was the use of the term “our boy is back”. Shouldn’t somebody be offended? :>}


23 posted on 06/17/2015 8:35:24 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Maybe they’ll do it at night so nobody can see ‘em.


24 posted on 06/17/2015 8:36:18 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Won’t the Mexican Government need to approve this, too?


25 posted on 06/17/2015 8:36:40 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I could point out that fracking activity is taxable and creates jobs and profits which are also taxable. But these are merely logical statements and libtards have a very difficult time with logic.


26 posted on 06/17/2015 8:37:54 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Yeah.... those nuts are not going to let California start fracking.


27 posted on 06/17/2015 8:40:49 AM PDT by kjam22 (my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

When the territory currently known as California USA gets divided up between the People’s Republic of Aztlan and the People’s Republic of China at some point in the not-too-distant future, the frackers will be fracking away in Monterey, and the useful-idiot envirowackos will be on bullet trains headed to the camps.


28 posted on 06/17/2015 8:54:20 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If fracking could cause California to fall off into the Pacific Ocean, I’m OK with the oilpatch taking the hit.


29 posted on 06/17/2015 8:54:28 AM PDT by TexasCajun (Hillary: Ethically Sleazy & Politically Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Petro Ping.


30 posted on 06/17/2015 9:03:03 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

“California could experience an economic boom similar to North Dakota’s oil rush.”

And they will find a way to squander any profits they make.


31 posted on 06/17/2015 9:12:10 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rktman
...California could experience an economic boom similar to North Dakota’s oil rush.

Not if the party in power has anything to say about it!

32 posted on 06/17/2015 9:15:54 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Fracking might be a good thing in CAliforny...for the U.S. Maybe it will cause it to fracture off at one of the fault lines and slide into the pacific. Sone cheap dessert land in Nevada would become valuable beach front property.


33 posted on 06/17/2015 9:17:42 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer

Got my beach front property in NV already. But, it’ll be a long drop down to the ocean.


34 posted on 06/17/2015 9:18:49 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Is this Lex Luthor?


35 posted on 06/17/2015 9:20:02 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Earthquakes have disturbed the layers of shale rock that run under most of the western state, making fracking more challenging than in a region like North Dakota.

That's putting it mildly. From an article on an oil industry site:

The current spate of renewed interest might be a no-brainer, but the Monterey play is no slam-dunk.

“The main uncertainty compared to a lot of the other plays is that the Monterey is highly deformed, and we don’t know how extensively fractured the rocks may be off of the tectonic structures where companies have been producing for years,” Behl emphasized.

“If it’s as fractured as the rocks in the higher parts of structures, maybe the oil is lost already and we’re too late,” he noted. “What this means is large areas of the Monterey formation that aren’t associated with the known structural and stratigraphic traps are now open to exploration.

“It’s up to us to come up with a model to find the places where the oil is still there.”

To say California geology is complex is an understatement.

In this region so deformed naturally by tectonic forces, oil is free to migrate, whereas it hasn’t migrated all that much in other shales. The Monterey is an unconventional rock, yet so much of its historical production has been conventional in that the oil has been expelled via the fractures to migrate into conventional traps, e.g. sandstone.

Behl noted that in the Los Angeles area, the Monterey and its equivalent are the primary source of oil, but the reservoirs are much younger turbidite sands.

In other words, the formation is both a resource of migrated oil for conventional production and a reservoir for unconventional production. The reservoir rock itself produced in the Santa Maria Basin as far back as 1900.


36 posted on 06/17/2015 9:31:35 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

No way, that would lower the ocean level.”

But I thought the seas are rising because of all the ice melting. And isn’t New York supposed to be under water in 2015? Maybe fracking would prevent this from happening? This is all soooooooooo confusing.


37 posted on 06/17/2015 9:32:13 AM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Maybe if Jeb and Jethro go shootin’ at some food in beverly hills, they might just find some bubblin’ crude.


38 posted on 06/17/2015 9:34:04 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Amazingly there is some fracking going on in that area. So far it has been low key and the anti’s have been told to back off and shut up.

I think California needs the revenue that the limited fracking provides. Now to do fracking on a grand scale will be too much for the anti’s and I don’t see it happening.


39 posted on 06/17/2015 9:51:56 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why not frac with sewer water.


40 posted on 06/17/2015 9:58:17 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson