Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside the Top Secret Plan to Revive U.S. Manufacturing
The Huffington Post's Business The Blog ^ | June 5, 2015 | Sarah A. Webster, Editor-in-Chief, Advanced Manufacturing Media

Posted on 06/08/2015 5:41:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Did you know the U.S. government has rolled out a big new federal program to revive the U.S. manufacturing sector?

The proposed budget for this new effort now surpasses $2.4 billion, and, surprisingly, it has received a level of bipartisan support that hasn't been seen for years, if not decades, for manufacturing.

This new program has a big mouthful of a name -- the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation or NNMI -- and it's targeted at correcting one of the most fundamental weaknesses in America's manufacturing infrastructure: our waning competitiveness in manufacturing technologies.

I call this project "top secret" because very few people know about it or understand it.

What are manufacturing technologies? Quite simply, they are the high-tech machines, tools, equipment and software that actually help make things in factories. Things like metalcutting machines, lasers, robots and, increasingly, 3D printers.

When the U.S. manufacturing sector began its long slide a few decades ago, which culminated in the loss of 6 million jobs between 2000 and 2011, a lot of blame was given to low wages in foreign countries and free trade deals. By and large, the conventional wisdom has been that profit-driven companies simply outsourced our jobs.

There was nary a mention of how the U.S. was losing its competitiveness in manufacturing technologies....

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 3dprinters; economy; employment; manufacturing; nocronyleftbehind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2015 5:41:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm surprised Obama didn't veto it...
2 posted on 06/08/2015 5:46:20 PM PDT by Popman (Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Huffing ton? They’re probably pushing a bloated government program that will strangle existing businesses, rather than help them, unless you are one of the favored elect.


3 posted on 06/08/2015 5:47:12 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
U.S. government has rolled out a big new federal program to revive the U.S. manufacturing sector?

The ten most frightening words in the English language.

4 posted on 06/08/2015 5:48:52 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

“You got a business? You didn’t build that.”


5 posted on 06/08/2015 5:49:09 PM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wage differences and tax differences were all the incentive needed to off-shore.

Getting behind in manufacturing technologies occurs because you no longer have the manufacturing base to innovate on. The innovation is occurring in the countries with the manufacturing, not here.

This article is trying to put the cart before the horse.


6 posted on 06/08/2015 5:50:34 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And the problem with this plan, is that it’s a subsidy that doesn’t fix the fundamental problem in the economy.

We will subsidize machines that the Chinese will then buy at a discount when the wage differentials undermine the new companies that received the subsidies. In effect we will be subsidizing new machines for the Chinese.


7 posted on 06/08/2015 5:52:13 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And the problem with this plan, is that it’s a subsidy that doesn’t fix the fundamental problem in the economy.

We will subsidize machines that the Chinese will then buy at a discount when the wage differentials undermine the new companies that received the subsidies. In effect we will be subsidizing new machines for the Chinese.


8 posted on 06/08/2015 5:52:13 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Boston Consulting Group has been laying out the case for reshoring of manufacturing to the US for several years. But it’s not an even playing field, some states/regions and some industries are going to benefit more than others, and some jobs in some industries will never return. Which is a good thing.


9 posted on 06/08/2015 5:52:50 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

You’re quite the cock-eyed optimist, aren’t you?


10 posted on 06/08/2015 5:52:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Offshored labor doesn’t qualify for Obamacare either.

The more government requirements on employers of those in the US, the fewer stateside jobs there will be at corporations in the US.


11 posted on 06/08/2015 5:59:40 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A bloated government program to “improve” competitiveness while at the same time doing what can be done to sell out whats left of American manufacturing competitiveness via trade agreements.

The chutzpah is amazing. And remember...we voted for it. See tagline.


12 posted on 06/08/2015 6:02:26 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Five-year plans for the national economy of the Soviet Union


13 posted on 06/08/2015 6:03:10 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sure, they will make solar panels with no workers on the line and will overproduce so that there will be no economical market for them.


14 posted on 06/08/2015 6:05:00 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Government sponsored organized crime (other than Chicago) ... government worker unions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Exactly.


15 posted on 06/08/2015 6:05:36 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How about we just stop double taxing, hyper-regulating, and torting manufacturers to death? Wouldn’t that be sufficient without anything proactive?


16 posted on 06/08/2015 6:06:50 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Figures, these people think the way to fix something is another government program.


17 posted on 06/08/2015 6:08:52 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Anything spawned and sponsored by the Government should be marked with the prefix "Dracula Program."

It will drain the lifeblood long before it produces any results.

18 posted on 06/08/2015 6:13:38 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
and some jobs in some industries will never return. Which is a good thing.

No patriot would ever say that.

19 posted on 06/08/2015 6:18:30 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We should give it a chance. After all, more government in business worked well for the Soviets.


20 posted on 06/08/2015 6:18:59 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson