Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NSA said to increase monitoring of US 'Net traffic to catch hackers
IT World ^ | 6/4/2015 | Grant Gross

Posted on 06/04/2015 6:49:53 PM PDT by markomalley

The U.S. National Security Agency is reportedly intercepting Internet communications from U.S. residents without getting court-ordered warrants, in an effort to hunt down malicious hackers.

The previously undisclosed NSA program monitors Internet traffic for data about cyberattacks originating outside the U.S., according to a New York Times article published Thursday and based on leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

President Barack Obama’s administration launched the NSA cybersecurity program without public notice or debate, according to the report.

Two mid-2012 memos from the U.S. Department of Justice allowed the NSA to target Internet traffic, including traffic inside the U.S., without getting warrants, the Times said. The DOJ allowed the NSA to monitor IP addresses and look for cybersignature patterns, although the NSA sought to target suspected hackers before it could establish links to foreign governments or crime groups.

The NSA and the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) defended the agency’s cybersecurity role.

With cyberattacks on the U.S. increasing in scale and sophistication, “it should come as no surprise that the U.S. government gathers intelligence on foreign powers that attempt to penetrate U.S. networks and steal the private information of U.S. citizens and companies,” ODNI said in a statement. “These operations play a critical role in protecting U.S. networks from disruptive, and even destructive, cyberthreats.”

Government intelligence agencies use a “number” of legal authorities to gather intelligence about foreign organizations engaged in cyberattacks on the U.S., ODNI added. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows intelligence agencies to target people “reasonably believed” to be outside the U.S., it said.

“The government cannot target anyone under the court-approved procedures unless there is an appropriate, and documented, foreign intelligence purpose,” ODNI added.

The NSA said it “plays a pivotal role in producing intelligence against foreign powers that threaten our citizens and allies while safeguarding personal privacy and civil liberties.”

All information acquired by the agency is “strictly handled and controlled,” the agency said in a statement. The data-handling procedures, approved by the U.S. attorney general, “do not simply limit the use or retention of information,” it added. “As importantly, they require NSA to limit the acquisition of U.S. person information in the first place.”

For data the NSA acquires under Executive Order 12333, a presidential surveillance directive dating back to 1981, the NSA generally cannot query communications content using U.S. identifiers such as a name or an email associated with a U.S. resident, unless the agency determines there are ties to a foreign intelligence purpose, the NSA said.

The undisclosed NSA program shows how the government can subvert civil liberties without public debate, said Bill Blunden, an IT security author and investigator.

The program is “a reminder that our legal framework can be countermanded in secret, and that this dynamic represents an existential threat to democratic governance,” he said by email.

This secrecy divides U.S. society into two groups, one with access to secret information and one without, he added. “This asymmetry undermines political participation as democracy necessitates a public that exercises sound judgement based on accurate information,” he said.

The NSA program was launched after the agency proposed using a warrantless surveillance program for cybersecurity, the Times report said. The agency received guidance on targeting cybersignatures from the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

After the DOJ tied the NSA’s cyberthreat surveillance to an existing program focused on monitoring foreign governments, the agency complained that those limits left a “huge collection gap against cyberthreats to the nation,” reported the Times, quoting an agency newsletter.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: bigbrother
No problem whatsoever with the Obama Regime monitoring all of my network traffic...none at all...


1 posted on 06/04/2015 6:49:53 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Surprise, Surprise


2 posted on 06/04/2015 6:51:28 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The NSA ARE the hackers!


3 posted on 06/04/2015 6:51:53 PM PDT by meyer (Who needs gas chambers when you have Obamacare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

They did a great job in catching those Chinese hackers. Oh, wait a minute...


4 posted on 06/04/2015 6:52:35 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Amazing huh? US residents are the villains. Hey clowns, look outside the US...OUTSIDE! The Chinese stole fed employee information. That’s from China, not the US.


5 posted on 06/04/2015 6:57:52 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meyer

>>The NSA ARE the hackers!<<

Oh..how true. Great post.


6 posted on 06/04/2015 7:03:35 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Laughable.


7 posted on 06/04/2015 7:22:21 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

You didn’t think they’d give up their online monitoring by closing out some of the PatriotAct provisions. They just traded out the old technology for the new technology. They’re not giving up monitoring all methods of communication. They’re just making improvements.


8 posted on 06/04/2015 8:06:54 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“The data-handling procedures, approved by the U.S. attorney general, ...”

There’s the problem right there.


9 posted on 06/04/2015 10:39:11 PM PDT by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
This is out of control government collecting everything on everybody so it can maintain and further control the citizenry.

The spying and collecting of data and other private information on US citizens is completely illegal and unconstitutional but most importantly it's almost certainly also against STATE law on many levels. So here's the good news.

The good news is we know exactly where all this data is collected and where it's stored. So when the American people finally get sick and tired of this crap we can simply get a local sheriff, a warrant, and if need be several thousand deputized patriotic Americans to seize as states evidence every last computer and cable at these data centers. Then the computers and the illegally obtained data they contain in violation of state law can be used for prosecutions. The computers would remain as states evidence and finally destroyed.

The End:

10 posted on 06/05/2015 12:48:41 AM PDT by precisionshootist (D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Like they caught all those terrorists.


11 posted on 06/05/2015 1:37:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson