Click the pic to the full-text Free Republic thread.
God set down some laws a long time ago, no amount of political correctness will ever change them.
What I find interesting is that friendly studies are where homosexual men admit (50 to 60 percent) that they are in open relationships, and that such relationships are harmless to children. I don’t like the idea of open relationships regardless of what “scientists” tell me though.
For later
More politicized, snipped, framed and massaged “science” -— like Global Warming. Gays come out. Trannies come out. Will the truth ever come out?
I see it a purely evolutionary response. The least qualified parental members of a species threatened by overpopulation has mutated to homo status.
Calling a skunk cabbage a rose doesn’t make it a rose.
Two “married” men are never going to adopt a young boy for the purpose of having sex with him.
Of course not. That’s never going to happen.
Click the pic to the full-text Free Republic thread.
Here is what the NFSS (along with the National Health Information Survey) can and does still tell us. These conclusions hold true, whether you read my original study, its follow-up, Simon Cheng and Brian Powell’s new analyses, or crunch the numbers yourself:
- The parental same-sex relationships reported by adult children are not, on average, long-term ones.
- The longer those parental relationships lasted, the better—on average—were the outcomes for adult children.
- Very few same-sex relationships lasted the entirety of the respondents’ childhood. Critics cried foul. I cried, “Reality!”
- The stability afforded by continuously intact mom-and-dad families pays benefits, on average, well into adulthood. They remain the standard against which all other forms ought to be compared.
Not a chance. Maintaining a lie as if it were true requires constant reinforcement and the absolute suppression of dissent.
Because everyone knows differences = bad. Which seems odd coming from the ideology that worships “diversity.”