Posted on 05/11/2015 4:09:51 PM PDT by HomerBohn
Behind the orchestrated riots that were allowed to strike Baltimore in recent weeks, and Ferguson, Missouri, before that, lies an agenda that has nothing to do with the fact that Black Lives Matter. As the Obama administration and more than a few race-mongers allied with the White House have already made clear, the real goal involves further chipping away at local self-government and community control over police departments and expanding federal control over local law enforcement in its place. In between fanning the division and unrest with racialist rhetoric, Obama is also exploiting the chaos he is helping to create in a bid to advance everything from a greater government role in childrearing to increased wealth redistribution.
In recent weeks, as anyone who watches the news knows, parts of Baltimore went up in flames. But despite the appearance of spontaneity, with crowds sparked to riot by the suspicious death of Freddie Gray in police custody, the chaos was no accident. In fact, as The New American reported recently, city officials ordered police to stand down so that looters and rioters could have what the mayor described as space to destroy. And destroy they did, garnering headlines worldwide and giving Big Government-promoting race profiteers a giant platform to spew propaganda. Now that the destroy phase is over, politicians, and especially Obama, are coming out of the woodwork to advance their government solutions.
Late last week, for example, the Obama administrations Justice Department announced that it would be launching an investigation of the Baltimore Police Department. Instead of investigating why the police were ordered to stand down and allow looters to assault innocent victims and burn down parts of the city, however, Obamas controversial new attorney general, Loretta Lynch, has other matters in mind. Among other angles being probed, Lynch said the investigation would focus on allegations that local police 50 percent black and controlled by a black mayor and a black police chief engaged in discriminatory policing. Incredibly, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, as if to acknowledge her own incompetence while throwing the police department she leads under the bus, actually invited D.C. to come help.
Apparently Lynch also feels the Justice Department has a lead role to play in fixing Baltimore by further expanding the gargantuan federal footprint there implicitly suggesting that the Obama administration believes Baltimores supermajority of black voters and their mostly black elected officials are incapable of doing it themselves. Our goal is to work with the community, public officials, and law enforcement alike to create a stronger, better Baltimore, the attorney general said, sounding oblivious to her actual constitutional duties and the subtle racism inherent in the idea that Baltimore needs federal assistance to sort out its local problems. Of course, allowing D.C. to further intrude into local issues will only make those problems worse yet that is the plan.
Ironically, despite the establishment medias efforts to conceal the fact, three of the officers charged in Grays death were black. The racism narrative, though, serves a number of important goals, and so it will continue to be shouted from the rooftops by race-mongers and the media, regardless of the facts. As if on cue, close Obama ally and race-profiteer Al Sharpton descended on the city and set out to dupe the people of Baltimore into believing that giving up their right to local self-government would somehow improve their police department. He called on the Justice Department to take over policing in this country, adding, Were going to have to fight states rights. Sharpton, of course, is a frequent visitor at the White House.
In a recent article exposing as a fraud the racialist narrative promoted by Sharpton, Obama, and others, writer Selwyn Duke also exposed the logical fallacy behind the thinking that stripping the people of Baltimore of their right to control their own police would somehow help matters. Our local-control model ensures that if we dont like our towns law-enforcement policies, we can vote for a different sheriff or mayor (who may appoint the police chief) next election, he wrote. Baltimore is a prime example. If blacks dont have a police force to their liking in a city with a black mayor, black police chief, and mostly black politicians voted into office by a population 70 percent black how will it help if their law-enforcement policy is determined by federal officials voted into office by a national population 87 percent non-black?
Regardless of the flawed logic or the U.S. Constitutions limitations on federal power, though, the Obama administrations agenda to federalize law enforcement and build up a massive new domestic security force using any conceivable pretext is hardly new. In fact, it has been apparent since before the presidential election. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we set, Obama said while running for the presidency. Weve got to have a civilian national security force thats just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. And indeed, in between attacks on police, the administration has been working feverishly toward those radical anti-constitutional goals.
More recently, Obama has openly promoted various schemes to nationalize police departments, including foisting federal standards on local and state police in exchange for bribes from Washington, D.C. Critics ridiculed the plot as Common Core for police, a reference to the Obama-backed national school standards being used to nationalize and globalize the education system. In many respects, it is a similar strategy. In addition, United Nations boss Ban Ki-moon even demanded last year that American police follow what he described as international standards. An Obama task force created with an executive order also recommended more federal control of law enforcement. In March, the administration announced six cities that would be used for a pilot program to essentially usurp local control of police under various pretexts.
In Baltimore, Obama again wasted no time in pushing his agenda. In fact, on May 1, before the smoke had even cleared, the White House, citing Baltimores riots, announced a new unconstitutional grant program for local police forces as if a lack of federal funding for police from a deeply indebted, out of control, and practically bankrupt government was the problem in Baltimore or anywhere else. Separately, another one of Obamas first reactions to the unrest in Baltimore was to whip up hysteria over race and class. If were just looking at it as policing, were looking at it too narrowly, Obama proclaimed, citing opportunity gaps that make it harder for blacks to succeed. Those opportunity gaps begin early, often at birth, and they compound over time, becoming harder and harder to bridge.
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) even blamed Obama and his constant efforts to drive wedges between people for sparking the riots in Baltimore. Obama allies, such as billionaire statist George Soros, who bankrolled Fergusons chaos; as well as race-monger Sharpton, who pours fuel on race fires; and the establishment media, which justifies rioting and violence, have also been critically necessary in promoting the establishment narrative. Whether black Americans have legitimate grievances is not the point all Americans have legitimate grievances, considering that their elected officials in D.C. and state capitols across America swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before trampling all over it. What is happening in America is about grievances that are being exploited, along with countless Americans, to advance a sinister agenda.
There is a reason that billionaire totalitarian Soros showered millions of dollars on activists to descend on Ferguson. There is a reason outside agitators went to Baltimore to whip up unrest. There is a reason the mayor ordered police to stand down. There is a reason the Obama administration and its allies are fanning the flames. There is a reason that the establishment is exploiting every conceivable fault line race, gender, socio-economic status, police versus community, and more to sow division among the American people. It has nothing to do with the undeniable fact that black lives, and all lives, matter and has everything to do with lawlessly empowering the out-of-control federal leviathan even further.
They want Socialist Justice.
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake spoke with President Obama by phone on Monday afternoon as the situation exploded. Does anyone think that Obama gave the word to Rawlings-Blake to stand down her officers? With a federalized police force, Obama would only have to call his director.
If we are not headed toward a dictatorship, what are we headed toward?
the key thing is this.....
installing the SS/SA/NationalPolice/KGB/Stasi
black lives DO matter to most of us, as do white and purple lives
but black lives matter NOT ONE WHIT to Obama/Sharpton/Holder/Wright and company. Or they would not have messed up so many black people’s opportunities to build good, successful lives for themselves (destroying the American economy, promoting a welfare state that keeps blacks in economic chains, etc.)
black lives do NOT matter to Obama/Sharpton/Holder and company. They only want to finish building their racist, IslamoNazi dictatorship to control and subjugate America (all of America, not just the black people they already so cleverly manipulate and control)
Hopefully, but not probably, a cleansing revolution that will 'reset' (kudos to Hitlery) our nation to 1912 in respect to elimination of most of an overbearing central socialist government and a judiciary that is completely out of control.
“If we are not headed toward a dictatorship, what are we headedd toward?”
A President Cruz and the Restoration of America!
bkmk
Boiled down federalizing the police force is simple.
A cop will have trouble killing people in his own neighborhood. BUT, send him to a neighborhood in another state and he feels no such guilt.
I hope I’m wrong but I ain’t.
It fit right in nicely with the methods and plans of another racist dictator a few decades ago.
Yes, and every leftist knows it and knows what he must do to make it happen. Politicians know what to say and the media knows what to hype and what to hide.
I think it was Michael Savage who brought up the case of Miriam Carey. A black single mother takes what is likely a wrong turn in near the White House, with her toddler in the car seat behind her. She’s shot by Capitol Police.
The feds have stonewalled the investigation. Her family has the baby but no answers.
But she wasn’t shot by a white cop, so her black life doesn’t matter.
The American people (at least the non libtards ) would never stand for a dictatorship...
One can argue we are in a very soft dictatorship at the moment...mostly due to spineless republicans, but 2016 is not far away...
Just like in 2010, 2012, 2014 we will continue to vote to clean out the sewer that is DC...
Hope you’re right, Popman, in your post #16.
Thanks for the ping Lucy!
While I’m relieved to see that others have picked up on the real agenda, the fact that this is happening at all is chilling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.