Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Environment - Not Farmers Using 80% of California's Water ?
CBS 47 via California Citrus Mutual Report ^ | 4-10-15 | cakid1

Posted on 04/10/2015 8:44:20 PM PDT by cakid1

Environment - Not Farmers Using 80% of California's Water ?

Does the California Citrus Mutual have a point?

In a Press Release - they also claim "The only sector that has been "exempt" from water reductions is, in fact, the largest user of water - the environment. "

" For a second consecutive year farmers in the Central Valley will receive a zero percent allocation of surface water from the Central Valley Project. Citrus growers in the Friant Service Area are among the most severely impacted. "

"As growers grapple with another year of no water, more and more acreage continues to be taken out of production."

"There is no denying that California is the midst of a water crisis," says California Citrus Mutual President Joel Nelsen. "For a fourth consecutive year Mother Nature has failed to provide the rain and snow desperately needed to replenish our nearly depleted reservoirs."

"This is not the first time California has experienced a drought and it certainly will not be the last. But until recent history, we have had the infrastructure and water policy necessary to navigate successfully through the inevitable dry years. Today, we do not have a system in place that is capable of meeting the State's growing demand."

"No sector has been asked, or forced, to take a cut as large as agriculture has. Citrus growers are receiving zero surface water this year. Trees, some decades-old, are being bulldozed. How much more of a cut can we take?" It is a widely sensationalized myth that agriculture uses 80% of California's water. According to information from the California Department of Water Resources, it is the environment that actually consumes a majority of the State's water resources, approximately 78.5%.

The chart below shows how California's water resources are divided between the environmental, agricultural and urban sectors. Both agriculture and the urban sector have been required and forced to reduce their water use.

The only sector that has been "exempt" from water reductions is, in fact, the largest user of water - the environment.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; californiadrought; facebook; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
* They also have a chart. Would appreciate help posting it here... Thanks Freepers.. And please share this thank you.
1 posted on 04/10/2015 8:44:20 PM PDT by cakid1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cakid1

2 posted on 04/10/2015 8:47:08 PM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

They should make the environment illegal. It causes a lot of problems.


3 posted on 04/10/2015 8:48:28 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

How much is dedicated to the bay area smelt?


4 posted on 04/10/2015 8:51:05 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; cakid1
LOL!

SOme of Californistan's biggest movers and shakers are also among the biggest users of water.

They have lists of CA government types who use over 1000 gallons of water DAILY (article title: Top Ten Water Wasters in California).

I can use 1200 gallons a month, if I splurge.

5 posted on 04/10/2015 8:54:20 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

probably the required delta outflow of 7%


6 posted on 04/10/2015 8:54:56 PM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I am not sure I even come close to that, lol


7 posted on 04/10/2015 8:55:57 PM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

PRELIMINARY DATA
SUBJECT TO REVISION WITHOUT NOTICE
EXECUTIVE OPERATIONS SUMMARY ON 4/10/2015
This summary can also be found at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/operationscontrol/docs/delta/deltaops.pdf
SCHEDULED EXPORTS FOR TODAY
Clifton Court Inflow = 525 cfs
Jones Pumping Plant = 1,000 cfs
State Water Project Informational Data can be found at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/operationscontrol/projectwide.cfm
ESTIMATED DELTA HYDROLOGY
Total Delta Inflow ~ 8,684 cfs
Sacramento River = 7,264 cfs
San Joaquin River = 849 cfs
Data for previous 30-days is available at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/operationscontrol/docs/delta/DeltaWQ.pdf
DELTA OPERATIONS
Delta Conditions = Balanced
Delta x-channel Gates (% of day is open) = 0%
Outflow Index ~ 9,500 cfs
% Inflow Diverted = 19% (14-day avg)
X2 Position > 81 km
Controlling Factor(s) = Vernalis 1:1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RESERVOIR STORAGES (AS OF MIDNIGHT)
Shasta Reservoir = 2,710 TAF
Folsom Reservoir = 572 TAF
Oroville Reservoir = 1,800 TAF
San Luis Res. Total = 1,332 TAF
SWP Share = 939 TAF
Reservoir data and reports are available at:
http://cdec.water.ca.gov/reservoir.html
Reservoir Releases
Keswick = 3,250 cfs
Nimbus = 500 cfs
Oroville = 800 cfs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Provisional Old River & Middle River Flows (as of 4/9/2015)
Based on USGS stations 11312676 & 11313405 via CDEC available at:
http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvo/vungvari/OMR_Apr2015.pdf


8 posted on 04/10/2015 8:59:38 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

Deport the millions of illegal aliens occupying California and consuming your water.


9 posted on 04/10/2015 9:05:20 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

Governor Brown should have a talk with this “Mother Nature”.
He seems like a real wimp.


10 posted on 04/10/2015 9:09:55 PM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

The “environment?”

I can’t wait to hear that the “moon” and “unicorns” were two of the top five users, as well.

I’d love to know the billing address for Mother Nature.


11 posted on 04/10/2015 9:10:09 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

And marijuana agriculturists.


12 posted on 04/10/2015 9:20:40 PM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

Bookmark


13 posted on 04/10/2015 9:23:38 PM PDT by publius911 (If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

Correction: POT Farmers Using 80% of California’s Water ?


14 posted on 04/10/2015 9:26:02 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Thank you GeronL !


15 posted on 04/10/2015 9:57:49 PM PDT by cakid1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

tsk tsk tsk- you’re a ‘water consumption denier’

It’s man fault, and that is settled science, the debate is over- so get ready to pay out the wazoo for something nature is doing


16 posted on 04/10/2015 10:35:44 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill; grundle; Robwin; SunkenCiv; cakid1; GeronL; arthurus; All

Pot farmers may use a lot of water, but it is in the northern part of the state, and I doubt if they are irrigating it where they hide it. Growing cotton there is ridiculous as are some other high water use crops. How much do they do with water sparing drip irrigation? Why aren’t farmers charged enough for water to make them take conservation and crop change seriously? There ought to be pool fees to pay for desalination and reservoirs. Do people use pool covers when not in use to reduce evaporation?

Here is an article discussing the seriousness of the situation, the potential impact on our food supply, etc. Lots of comments, a number informative with interesting links.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-the-california-drought-will-be-worse-than-everyone-thinks-2015-04-07?page=1


17 posted on 04/10/2015 11:33:44 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

How dare they! kill the farmers that supply us with food so that we may drink water....... they chant!


18 posted on 04/11/2015 3:07:42 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Empty head empty suit = arrogant little bastard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cakid1

I doubt the Hollywood leftists will be giving up their swimming pools, lavish spas and long showers, but will still criticize the masses for wasting water with showering and flushing.


19 posted on 04/11/2015 5:35:12 AM PDT by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Maybe covering those hundreds of miles of concrete canals would help. It would cost a lot but they could do that instead of building that $10 billion train.


20 posted on 04/11/2015 5:51:35 AM PDT by Straight8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson