Posted on 04/09/2015 10:09:38 AM PDT by detective
For more than two decades the world has been subjected to a growing cacophony of doomsayers — politicians, environmental activists, scientists, academics, and media mavens — demanding global action to stop anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming, or AGW. The AGW threat, we have been told incessantly, is “apocalyptic” and “existential” in magnitude, endangering all life on planet Earth: melting icecaps, melting glaciers, rising sea levels, floods, droughts, desertification, “extreme weather,” species extinction, etc.
However, contrary to the dire predictions of the alarmists, the Earth has not been heating up. In fact, for more than the past 18 years global mean temperatures have stayed steady, or have slightly cooled, according to the satellite readings. If you are unaware of this fact, or doubt its authenticity, that is not surprising; the powers that be in the worlds of politics and media have gone to incredible lengths to cover up this important truth with continued policies and headlines proclaiming the alleged impending perils from “climate change.” They are hoping to build public support for global punitive taxes and regulations at the United Nations’ Climate Summit in Paris later this year.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
The article does not address the widespread data fraud in "climate models". But it does show what the many models have in common.
They have all failed to accurately predict temperatures. They have all predicted higher temperatures than have occurred.
Yeah, they always point at the models as soon as people ask questions.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Thousands of computer models and they all come out different and none of them can even predict the past.
This means they are not scientifically accurate at all. If the climate models worked, they would all produce similar results and work no matter what temp and weather patterns from history are put in.
For aiding in ecowacko/gangreen/algorism/erffirsters cranial overload.....
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet’
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Pop goes the cranium.
WX models can’t predict 48 hours into the future with any degree of accuracy and we’re supposed to trust models based on even less proven algorithms? Actually, proven wrong, every one.
Zactly. There is NO Climate Science. Only scientists and pseudo scientists working to develop same. Given the system under study its unlikely to be able to achieve the nominal goal. It has become totally political.
I find the 10 day weather forecasts to be useful...
Bookmark
Another question to ask: Define the “correct” amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.
The ask them to explain why the earth was warmer than it is now during the following:
Medieval Warm Period
Roman Warm Period
Holocene Optimum
I will give some thought to global climate change if, using their computer models, they can tell me today what the exact weather will be in Oklahoma City on January 30, 2016.
That would include cloud cover, temperature ( high and low ), and precipitation amounts. I realize the data required for this prediction would be vast, but must be relatively small compared to the data required to predict the climate 25 to 50 years in the future.
Any “new” climate model that does not support existing climate models invalidates ALL previous models.
bump
Joe Bastardi at WeatherBell does a few minutes each saturday commenting about the climate change fraud.
Liberals, Morality, And ‘Global Warming’
Global Warming on Free Republic
My guess - since we're living within a self correcting system - is the correct answer would vary with time...
Apropo nothing, what's the 'correct' weight for a human?? (for the sake of argument we'll pretend age and height don't matter ...) Oh - and great list rkman.
I wonder if it has anything to do with earth’s magnetic field weakening, or shifting.
Thr Arctic does seem to be warming, while Antarctica’s ice is growing.
I have no doubt the extremely intelligent FReepers could add many more “un-answerable” questions to the list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.