Posted on 04/01/2015 2:03:50 PM PDT by Nachum
A Belgian insurance company has refused to insure a Jewish kindergarten in Brussels.
The company claimed the risk of a terror attack on the European Jewish Association-run institution was too high.
EJA General Director Rabbi Menachem Margolin called on all European governments and heads of European Union institutions to provide security to all Jewish institutions that would satisfy insurance companies, and establish an alternative insurance mechanism that would secure any institution that might fall victim to anti-Semitic attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishpress.com ...
But it’s just random violence. Why would it bear greater risk than any other event?
I have stated for years that communities cannot draw or keep businesses that provide jobs & are an asset to the area IF they DO NOT keep crime under control.
Good employees cannot be obtained.
Insurance rates in a high crime area kill the business.
High crime makes finding a safe home for your family harder, if not impossible.
As long as the Liberal JUST US system & the revolving door of criminal detainment is the norm, businesses won’t be coming to what might otherwise be a favorable area to have your business.
I have chanted this for years. SOME people are now listening to me.
Terrorists that are NOT IDENTIFIED as TERRORISTS by leaders of countries-—such as OBAMA—then, the insurance companies cannot be demanded to pay for the damages done by criminals & terrorists.
This is a top-down problem, but Obama & Holder & others are TEFLON.
Anti-Semitism rears its ugly head again.
You would think that a business in such a bind would boycott muslim madrassas.... But noooo
Holocaust denial #1 is antisemitic. Holocaust denial #2 is more general, ie. Keeping jews disarmed and without alternative means.
so they admit the towelheads kill Jews
Unbelievable.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Not only could happen here but I believe Churches, particularly rural, pay significantly higher rates due to the risk of fire. There is an underwriting issue here. Stopping it requires government regulation. Could be an issue for life and health insurance in the future.
I can suggest some mechanisms.
Those manufactured by Glock right next door in Austria spring to mind.
Just a thought.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.