Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cable lobby eyes opening to rewrite Web law
The Hill ^ | 03/21/15 | Julian Hattem

Posted on 03/21/2015 11:39:00 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg

Cable and telecom industry lobbyists are launching an effort to convince lawmakers to support new legislation that replaces federal Internet regulations.


After the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued its new regulations to treat the Web like a public utility, major companies are now sensing an opening to escape what they consider crushing net neutrality regulations.

“The 400-page order really is starting, to us, a process on the hill,” said one telecommunications industry lobbyist who was granted anonymity in order to speak freely about the plans.

“Our focus and our priority [is] to makes sure everyone understands what the FCC did, understand the legal risk of what the FCC did and see if there’s a common path forward,” they added.

“Having this document allows us to start having that new conversation.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bohica; cable; fcc; internet; netneutrality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The Money Quote:
“The 400-page order really is starting, to us, a process on the hill,” said one telecommunications industry lobbyist who was granted anonymity in order to speak freely about the plans.

IOW, BOHICA...

Congress Critters will now sell the INTERNETS to the highest bidder...

Woohoo, Net Neutrality be awesome shiz baby!

1 posted on 03/21/2015 11:39:01 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

EVERYBODY, government bureaucrats, government regulators, politicians of all stripes, etc. need to quit trying to fix something that’s NOT BROKEN.


2 posted on 03/21/2015 11:52:50 PM PDT by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BFL


3 posted on 03/22/2015 12:00:41 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Net Neutrality has ALWAYS been about money...

Anything the government does now is based on Congress Critters and other Gub'ment blood suckers selling legislation and/or regulation deferments so as to line their pockets with lobby money.

4 posted on 03/22/2015 12:02:07 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

“We’ll keep fixing it until it’s broken” -Bureaucrat #43284c


5 posted on 03/22/2015 12:03:10 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Every "improvement" or "progress" since around the 60's has ultimately cost America her freedom, dignity and sovereignty
6 posted on 03/22/2015 12:15:14 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Looking twenty years ahead....what is the landscape of TV and cable?

Over half of the population will be data-streaming their favorite shows. A few networks like Discovery and History will be around because they do unique stuff. ABC, CBS, and NBC? They will downsize because they can’t produce the stuff that the public wants...high-quality scripts and creativity. Netflix and Amazon will be producing shows that people want to watch....shocking people with a season of only twelve to fifteen shows instead of twenty-four that the networks opt for.

It’s the data stream that matters, and if you look around cable hasn’t exactly made it’s way into the vast nature of America. To reach the bulk of America with data streaming...you need to share tax-revenue of some type. Most of us would disagree with this and opt for the consumer to drive the trend, but that would delay things by a decade (minimum). I think their ‘secret’ plan is to reach some plateau of data streaming to every single American by 2025....no matter how remote they are...we will reach them.


7 posted on 03/22/2015 12:20:14 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Many people in government swore an oath to the U.S Constitution and NOT a stinking politician.

The FCC has NO AUTHORITY to bypass the U.S. Constitution to write NEW law and/or enforce NEW regulation. It just does not work that way as much as they WISH it and EVERYONE KNOWS THAT.

Three unelected people DO NOT HAVE THAT authority. Three people are not more powerful than the Legislative, Executive or Judicial Branch. They KNOW IT TOO.

Anyone enforcing this is a collaborator of a stinking control freak politician, betraying their oath to the U.S. Constitution and ultimately to we the people.

Good men and women did not die for this country to have a little power hungry control freaks declaring they have powers that the U.S Constitution does not grant them.

Anyone enforcing this is a collaborator and ultimate Traitor to the U.S. Constitution and the Republic.


8 posted on 03/22/2015 12:23:58 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This is the legislative pushback. There will also be a court pushback.


9 posted on 03/22/2015 2:24:07 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Long-time reader, first-time poster.

You’re right. The FCC jumped it this time.

However, it’s monopolistic cable vs the government. It’s a catch-22 for conservatives. This should be a free market thing!

I know a little about this because I’m tech, so also take with a grain of salt, because I have a vested interest in my business. Big telcos try to get more money out of sites like mine for better access to consumers. Consumers want the best access they can get. That last is “net neutrality” - telcos can’t ask more for different traffic.

I hate hate hate that the FCC is involved. It’s scary. Now it moves from “hey, stop monopolistic business stuff” to “the government is in command now”. Nobody wants that.

My $0.02


10 posted on 03/22/2015 4:50:22 AM PDT by some tech guy (Stop trying to help, Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I would argue that fiber optic broadband is actually a localized monopoly with no rate or service regulation that rips off consumers.

There is no localized competition

It doesn’t work so long as competition is not permitted

Broadband was surreptitiously brought into homes piggybacked on TV cable. Local governments did not realize they had power that was surrendered to tv cable companies


11 posted on 03/22/2015 4:57:11 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Yeah, but that’s what they do, and have been doing for decades in every Federal agency. And there’s not a damn thing that will be done to stop them.


12 posted on 03/22/2015 5:02:49 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Obama will veto any change to the law.


13 posted on 03/22/2015 5:46:33 AM PDT by Pluto is NOT a Planet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
"Net Neutrality has ALWAYS been about money..."

True, as in there's not enough bandwidth (money) for everyone to stream whatever they want. So the companies throttled. Now, under Obama's plan, they can still throttle but lawyers will lie and sue and collect class action money. That part is still about the money. I read most of the 300+ pages and the rebuttal. Obama's regs are about money for lawyers.

14 posted on 03/22/2015 6:17:11 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
To reach the bulk of America with data streaming...you need to share tax-revenue of some type

Everyone can not simply stream whatever they want whenever they want. There is not enough BW in the air out here (rural) and fiber is prohibitive. That might work in cities where they can run the fiber.

The real problem with streaming video is that it is all crap. You can argue that it is "high quality" and creative but that is because you are comparing it to even worse crap.

15 posted on 03/22/2015 6:20:49 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: some tech guy
"That last is “net neutrality” - telcos can’t ask more for different traffic."

You should know that really isn't the case. The internet easily routes around much more vigorous censorship in China and Iran. The best that those authoritarian regimes can do is cut off nearly all access and deliver an AOL-like pseudo internet. The cable companies here obviously cannot do that. So what content you want, you can easily route through any available services, up to the BW of streaming video.

What you cannot do is route streaming video inside something else because streaming is already too high to be hidden in something else. So the bottom line is that the cable companies can censor (i.e. charge more for) nothing, except streaming video which is mainly dreck anyway.

16 posted on 03/22/2015 6:25:21 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

The FCC laid out the welcome mat to the Crony Capitalists. Just undo exactly what the FCC did and nothing more, nor less.


17 posted on 03/22/2015 6:36:06 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Net Neutrality repeal?

18 posted on 03/22/2015 7:11:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Didn't make it in before the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: some tech guy

Post more.


19 posted on 03/22/2015 8:11:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The FCC takeover of the internet will quickly become a means to censorship of dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
It is as if Xero was handing the corporate Repellicans a way to raise "contributions" by giving them something to sell. If they do it right, they can sell it to younger voters in the tech industry. If they do it wrong, they'll end up as whipping boys.

Under McConnell, my bet is that they're masochists.

20 posted on 03/22/2015 8:14:01 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson