Walker is 100% GOPe.
Posted on 03/16/2015 8:28:38 PM PDT by gwgn02
pot. kettle. hypocritical.
I wonder if her amnesty promoting employers are connected to Scott's campaign, and that is how he hired her.
If Walker becomes President, would you support him hiring a Muslim Spokesperson, who had very questionable ties and or views regarding terrorism?
I noted you completely evaded the questions, and attempted to make me the issue.
Geeze. Perhaps Walker is pro Amnesty.
Honestly, the entire country, FR included, are like crush-silly teens, expecting their beloved to act the way they dream they will act.
Walker is pro amnesty. Duh.
Just the slightest google ‘research’ reveals this. Ask why he went against the unions.
Motivation is everything in such matters. It shows a projection. Where is he going with it.
‘He’s bounced back and forth on this issue. And I don’t like that.’
Here’s where any fifteen year old girl advises her BFF: then break up with him
It only gets worse. He doesn’t change, sweetie
It wasn’t a question. It was a grenade wrapped in a retarded hypothetical situation that was masquerading as a question. no serious person would have dignified your “question” with an answer.
“Why hire a loser “
That’s what bothers me.
A professional can be hired without regard to their past clients. But she’s a loser: Fiorina and Perry.
He should hire an “online communicator” who knows how to win.
It wasn’t a question. It was a grenade wrapped in a retarded hypothetical situation
See the ? above? It mean a question. A very basic legitimate and credible question, which you have repeatedly evaded.
Did I hire that staffer or did he? Did I make Breitbart write about it?
pot. kettle. hypocritical.
**************************************************************
It’s not hypocritical to suggest that someone being paranoid needs to lighten up -—particularly when he writes that he is inferring a conspiracy (apparently to attack Scott Walker). If you knew of the posters here you would know that most like Scott Walker and desperately want him to avoid slashing his own political throat by actions such as this. People become known by the associations they make...if you lie down with dogs, you’ll get fleas. Scott Walker does not need to self-destruct, but he may be in the process of doing so-—unfortunately.
Walker is 100% GOPe.
the question was a howler. the odd part is that you seem to be so proud of it, which I find . . . Perplexing.
your feigned offense isn’t working. if there is an anti-Walker thread anywhere in al gore’s innerwebz, you are going to post it here.
Walker’s been advocating amnesty and virtual open borders for years. Even if he fires her it will only be to try to hide and mislead on his real pro-amnesty/open borders position.
Amnesty is the reason Scott Walker must not be the GOP nominee.
Is gonna “evolve” after the election?
Exactly.
That’s what I was wondering.
Walker must be doing something RIGHT, if you get my drift.
So far you've called the question a "grenade" question, a "retarded" question and now a "howler" question.
It just a legitimate question.
Not answering the question is quite revealing and very inquisitive from my perspective.
Why all the evasion?
What, now you’re gonna badger a good Freeper who posts lots of good threads here—because you don’t want other Freepers to read the truth about Walker?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.