Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Kid Shelleen
Seems like all of science’s children have gone off the rails.
2 posted on
03/12/2015 4:28:41 PM PDT by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: Kid Shelleen
He says Stephen Hawking in behind 9/11?
To: Kid Shelleen
Carl’s book ‘Billions, etc’ started out well and ended as a global warming advertisement. I lost respect for one who was not a bad author.
4 posted on
03/12/2015 4:33:25 PM PDT by
sasquatch
To: Kid Shelleen
Carl Sagan was good until about 11 years old, then at around 19ish I fell in extreme like with Michael Cricton and Tom Clancy
6 posted on
03/12/2015 4:35:19 PM PDT by
Usagi_yo
(Islamic Vendetta)
To: Kid Shelleen
"And the way it was reported in the media before it happened, that doesn't happen. You know?"
I remember 9/11, I was listening on the radio all day. Building 7 was mentioned because there was a danger of it collapsing. It had been burning all day and fire fighters refused to put it out because it had lost structural integrity. But when I mention that to a 9/11 "truther", they say I'm lying. So now I'm part of the conspiracy, apparently.
7 posted on
03/12/2015 4:36:23 PM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Kid Shelleen
I was willing to cut him a break due to youthful stupidity but apparently this idiot is 55 years old.
8 posted on
03/12/2015 4:36:39 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA)
To: Kid Shelleen
Pete Carol coach of the Seahawks is one also ....
9 posted on
03/12/2015 4:38:15 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
To: Kid Shelleen
“Carl Sagan is arguably science’s biggest rockstarthe ultimate champion for logic and reason.”
Oh, come on! How long has he been dead? I think it’s more like Carl Sagan WAS arguably sciences biggest rockstarthe ultimate champion for logic and reason.
10 posted on
03/12/2015 4:38:51 PM PDT by
equaviator
(There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
To: Kid Shelleen
3D Life had to start somewhere FIRST?.... why not here..
What happens when 3D life becomes OBSOLETE... like; it was a TEST.. a phase.. a process..
11 posted on
03/12/2015 4:41:08 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
To: Kid Shelleen
Color me stunned!
To: Kid Shelleen
Actually, sonny boy thinks as logically as daddy...both are off the reservation.
To: Kid Shelleen
Morons run in the family.
15 posted on
03/12/2015 4:45:07 PM PDT by
boomop1
(Term limits is the only source of change.)
To: Kid Shelleen
Let me be the first anti-government heretic on this post. If the government story on 9/11 is completely accurate, how do explain the building 7, collapse, the cell phone calls at 30,000 feet, and the airline stock puts before 9/11?
16 posted on
03/12/2015 4:45:10 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Democrats & GOPe delenda est. President zero gave us patient zero.)
To: Kid Shelleen
Billyuns and billyuns of tiny muslims . . .
17 posted on
03/12/2015 4:52:35 PM PDT by
mykroar
("Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." - Otto von Bismarck)
To: Kid Shelleen
So he’s supporting Rand Paul for President, I take it ?
To: Kid Shelleen
The thing I don't get about the "controlled demolition" theorists is that they (usually) don't deny that the planes hit the building. But if the planes hit the building, wouldn't that in and of itself be regarded as an act of war, regardless of whether the buildings eventually collapsed?
If 9/11 was an inside job, why would the conspirators have had the planes fly into the buildings AND wired the buildings for demolition? The whole thing is nuts. My local public access TV channel is full of 9/11 crap, and I get livid listening to it. ("Then don't listen to it.") I just want to smack those people with their smug, slanderous paranoia.
To: Kid Shelleen
What is a 911 truther, specifically?
22 posted on
03/12/2015 5:07:47 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
To: Kid Shelleen
"Carl Sagan's Son Is a 9/11 Truther..." Yes, and I suspect he also blows bubbles in his own drool. Global climate change is of course his most fervently held religious belief when he's not busy molesting small animals or sacrificing his imaginary girlfriends to the god of pitter patter. Gee, what a surprise.
25 posted on
03/12/2015 5:13:37 PM PDT by
Desron13
To: Kid Shelleen
"Carl Sagan is arguably science's biggest rockstarthe ultimate champion for logic and reason. "Yep- he's in the same exalted class as the genius Al Gore.
31 posted on
03/12/2015 5:21:41 PM PDT by
matthew fuller
(God put me on Earth to eradicate cancer and liberalism. I'm starting with liberalism.)
To: Kid Shelleen
Carl Sagans son is too f**king stupid to be an idiot. To explain again for the millionth time. The outside supporting steel columns for the the shape of the building itself, two hundreds yards by two hundred yards square. The floors were’’ carried off’’ that is to say, supported by light weight steel structures called trusses. These were welded to the outside steel columns and then anchored steel brackets fastened to the concrete core that housed the elevator shafts in the inside of this core which as ran through this core the buss ducts for the electrical systems as well as steam pipes and water pipes. Once your anchored the truss in a pattern creating a floor lay out you take large galvanized corrugated sheet ‘’pans’’, You weld these to the steel for lay out and pour the concrete floor and viola , you have a floor. Replicate this 110 times and you have a 110 story office building. To secure the four sided steel ‘’box’’, that is the outside steel columns the builders constructed a 9 ton steel ‘’cap’’. A steel structure looking some what like a steel horse but what this cap had wa a square shape and four ‘’legs’’ that held the steel columns in place. Explosive would not have bought down either of the buildings as they had floor space that was very wide and plenty of glass that would have dissipated the force of the blast. The ‘’controlled demolition’’ theory is total and complete bullsh!t. What destroyed the Trade center was heat. Heat weakend the trusses, softening to the point where the top ones snapped away from the outside steel columns and gravity took over.
32 posted on
03/12/2015 5:21:54 PM PDT by
jmacusa
(Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson