Posted on 03/12/2015 4:27:21 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
Carl Sagan is arguably science's biggest rockstar—the ultimate champion for logic and reason. Which makes it all the more painful to find out that his son is a vehement 9/11 truther.
In a recent interview for a radio show called 9/11 Free Fall (already off to a great start), Jeremy Sagan—the younger son of Sagan senior and his first wife, fellow scientist Lynn Margulis—went off on all us closed-minded sheeple. In response to a prompt asking when he first "woke up," Sagan remarks:
(Excerpt) Read more at gizmodo.com ...
Um, unless should read in less. Cannot type well on tiny screen. Sorry.
It’s ok, I knew what you meant, will follow your link now thanks.
For that matter, I "believe" you'd find the steel all there, too. Just not all the concrete.
You can see in the photo above (if JR let's it stay) particulated material and debris (white and light grey, likely pulverized wallboard and concrete) founting up like a volcano as energy is released and it is being converted to powder. Where does that energy of 3200 meters/sec necessary to accomplish this originate ... from the act of falling? .... as the force of gravity is the only force allowed in the official narrative what accounts for the energy deficiency? Friction?
What actions of the building collapsing created enough energy to grind and mill those materials so thoroughly they blew away on the wind?
Concrete, even after the act of falling, is still concrete.
Invoking the alien meme is unecessary, it is the 21st Century and men alone are right smart enough. It's no more than modern technology, used right before our eyes and most of us aren't prepared to believe what we're seeing or how it was done. Consequently, I can't blame anyone for not.
And FreedomStar, as for the company line being bullshit ... are you drawing me out for a "hiding" too?, as comments upthread certainly leave a chilling effect on any meaningful dialog. Let's just leave it at that.
For me, its as disgusting as having to watch a snuff film over and over.
With careful listening to Steven Jones it is apaprent that he is mistaken in his analysis. He states early on that Newton’s law requires an equal and opposite force to be pulverizing the upper floors of the towers as they fall. But he then tells us that nano-thermite cut the columns such that near free-fall speed is achieved in the collapses. You can’t have it both ways. If there is a cutting of the supports by his ‘nano-thermite’ then there is no eqaul and opposite force to ‘pulverize’ the upper floors as they fall. And the video evidence shows these floors did not reach the ground as a rigid body, they were dustified in mid-fall. The word ‘pulverize was chosen by Jones because it aligns with his specious explanation. In reality, the buildings were turned to dust in mid fall and this cvannot be accomplish so quickly (or even at all) by a pancaking of the floors.
Acrobatic flying? Haha, more like magical flying. There are forty foot light poles in the path of the supposed plane that hit the pentagon. There were still standing nint he parking lot around the Pentagon after whatever went past and into the first floor of the building.
Here's a sarcasm thing, in case its' needed. /s
You made us remember Carl Sagan for the first time in months or years or even decades.
You introduced us to his son, who nobody had ever heard of before.
So, two points for the Sagans.
Perhaps this thread slipped in under the radar since the topic was Sagan’s son, not 911 per se.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.