If people, not Islam, cause terrorism, then do people, not guns, cause violence?

my fevered brain ^ | today | me

[JOHN ADAMS]

Obama, at the "ending terrorism without identifying it" conference, said that “No religion is responsible for terrorism — people are responsible for violence and terrorism,” It sounded strangely familiar, so I thought it worth a vanity post to point out that his logic, such as it is, doesn't stop with exculpating Islam.

[Erik Latranyi]

Beat you to it. I posted it in one of the threads analyzing Obama’s Summit.

It is a great point in contradictory thinking.

[ArtDodger]

I see a re-education kamp in your future!

[fatnotlazy]

Ask a liberal. His head will explode.

[Russ]

It’s too nuanced for you to understand.

[blueyon]

That is exactly what I said to my hubby last night. You do know that a liberal will never be able to see this bit of logic......

[Bayard]

If people not Islam, than do people cause violence and not religion?

[BobP]

And what do jack wagons who profess "Jobs for Jihadis" cause?

[LibFreeUSA]

Using ‘their’ logic, are they going to outlaw Islam.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks JA.

[BradyLS]

If people, not Islam, cause terrorism, then do people, not guns, cause violence?

Hssh! People are invited to attend re-education training for saying such things! ;-)