[marron]

There is no such thing as a free country where you can’t have a cigarette with your coffee after your meal.

[doc1019]

More nanny state crap. Let the bars and restaurants make up their own minds on this issue. If a bar/restaurant decides to allow smoking, non smokers can go somewhere else.

I’m sure there would be enough tree hugging bar/restaurant owners to satisfy the non smokers.

[Drango]

I agree. There is no freedom in addiction.

[Cold Heat]

Yeah....lol...I stopped flying commercial when they banned smoking on airplanes...

I certainly don’t need to smoke when eating, but the bar ban has caused me to drink at home.

They won’t get my business and if they don’t miss it, I really don’t care. I only go to places and do things where I am comfortable. If I am not, I just don’t do that..

[Caipirabob]

There is no such thing as a free country where you can’t have a cigarette with your coffee after your meal.

Agreed. This is all NAZI crap and the left is just eating it up.

[logic101.net]

Remember when we were told that it was crazy talk to suggest that the mandatory “non-smoking sections” in restaurants would lead to bans on smoking in bars?

Remember when they told us that seat belt laws would never be a “primary” offense?

[MeshugeMikey]

its beed decades sonce smoking was okay in either restaurants or bars in my neck of the woods.

As a matter of fact smoking in public is often met with great dismay by the ever so PURE True Believer.

The collectivists,,,,run the place

[Rodamala]

There is no such thing as a free country where you can’t have a cigarette with your coffee after your meal.

How we have fallen... and so quickly at that.