Oh please. The "motive" was to get rid of the newborn. Millions of women do the same thing, except they usually don't burn them alive in the street. Instead, they have a "doctor" dismember the child while still in the womb, inject it with saline solution, or have the base of its skull split open and its brains sucked out while it is still squirming and trying to survive.
I expect she will get a minimum sentence for this horrific crime. If she is guilty, then abortion (even late term abortion) is wrong. They will blame her evil acts on "post-partum depression." Another case of "not guilty by reason of ovaries."
Obama’s Amerika on full display...
We should dose her with WD40 and set her on fire. Of course she was just doing a post partum abortion.
Probably one of the DemocRATS’ “dreamers”.
“...You know the thing about a shark, he’s got... lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll’s eye. When he comes at ya, doesn’t seem to be livin’. “
Our society passed sick and perverted some time back. I can’t say when, but we have definitely passed the point of no return.
There is no coming back folks. Plan accordingly.
Should be hanged by the neck until dead.
Geeeez. If Obama had a son.......
Hyphernkemberly Dorvilier
A very arresting name she has.
It appears that the dog waste was on the outside of the bag.
100% pure, undiluted evil.
This was way too dramatic to just be "getting rid of it." This was hatred at the psycho level, and I'm betting it was a message to the father of the baby, too.
She was simply having a do-it-yourself, late-term abortion. I see no difference.
There are so many who seem to have no souls. They have no conscience and their eyes show it - windows to a dead soul.
“Oh please. The “motive” was to get rid of the newborn. Millions of women do the same thing, except they usually don’t burn them alive in the street. Instead, they have a “doctor” dismember the child while still in the womb, inject it with saline solution, or have the base of its skull split open and its brains sucked out while it is still squirming and trying to survive.”
it is a distinction without a difference as you point out! It’s murder ether way, but right now the “law” affords a born human being some protections not given to the unborn so I say hang this piece of “human garbage” in the public square.
PLEASE tell me that is not its real name
Killing the child seems to be want she wanted. Drowning it or throwing it out the window would have the same result but might be a modicum infinitesimally less agonizing. Why use a method that is certainly the worst most horrific way to die? It’s hard enough to accept a mother killing their own child. But why make the child suffer in the process?