I am willing to compromise. I want FedGov slashed by 50% (literally, I would cut half the spending immediately). I would be happy with a compromise that cut 25% and comfortable with a compromise that only cut 10% the first year. There is lots of room for real compromise. But if RINOs are saying we need to increase the size of FedGov 7% this year, because that’s better than 10%, no, thank you.
I am willing to compromise on the Second Amendment. I think all firearms laws at the federal, state, and local levels should be repealed immediately. If they want to start with just NFA, repealing the restrictions on suppressors in the first year, and repealing cosmetic restrictions on “scary black guns” and magazine size limits, and then move on to other unconstitutional laws, I’m okay with compromising on a gradual approach.
That’s not what liberals mean by “compromise”? They mean we give up even more, but at a slower rate than they would prefer? That’s what I thought.
Getting a spending freeze would be nearly impossible these days