To: bestintxas
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% won’t generate enough revenue.
9 posted on
01/12/2015 6:12:41 AM PST by
Poser
(Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% won’t generate enough revenue. Then the spending levels must be cut.
11 posted on
01/12/2015 6:15:46 AM PST by
ealgeone
To: Poser
It would on the corporate taxes. Many large corporations pay very little fed tax.
17 posted on
01/12/2015 6:21:58 AM PST by
Vermont Lt
(Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% won’t generate enough revenue. You have it backwards. If the revenue is not "enough", then cut spending. Eliminate the entire welfare state, and 10% will be plenty to finance the government's legitimate functions as laid out in the Constitution.
26 posted on
01/12/2015 6:38:33 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: Poser
10% won’t generate enough revenue.That's their problem. They should have to live on the income they have, like the rest of us. Cut out the waste and fraud.
69 posted on
01/12/2015 8:19:49 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels.You mean the spending levels that added 7.5 trillion to the deficit?
71 posted on
01/12/2015 8:30:51 AM PST by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson